I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period
So are we still more upset about Diverse, but qualified, yet presumed unqualified hires, than DUI hires?
(Asking for anyone who cares about US National Security)
Pete Hegseth needs to go for the safety of the United States & the allies that we still have.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
Would love to hear and learn more about efforts to save local news and sustain unbiased, factual reporting so Americans can hold government accountable. It seems that so many hometown newspapers are closing shop and being swallowed up by conservative and right-wing influenced private monies likely to give us even more 'Fox News' style journalism. How can we make sure that some news entities still support reporting factual information?
There are quite a few efforts. But ultimately local news needs a new business model since classifieds and local ads were essentially replaced by the internet.
In 2014, I attended a "Jeffersonian Dinner" with eleven other people, including the grandson of William Randolph Hearst, the former President of CBS News, Pulitzer Prize winning journalists and others. I was there to discuss a model capable of radically improving US journalism. You can learn more about it at www.bit.ly/RADCollab.
How do you square this proposal to build and rely on a unified, ad-supported hometown journalism model under one company, when a handful of major publishers eating up existing newsrooms is already the problem? Maybe my question doesn't make sense, I'm just eager to learn more.