It’s all good when iron sharpens iron and we don't resort to mischaracterizations and name-calling, so I'll try to be precise. Our disagreement is not about Trump. It’s about logic. You stated a premise: “Trump mandated lockdowns.” Then you cited a source contradicting your premise. I pointed that out, and you said your source is a murderous liar. Do we agree your source undermines if not disproves your premise? If verifiable facts prove Trump mandated lockdowns, I'd like to see them. You can move the goalposts or pivot to irrelevance, but so far, facts deny your premise.