And yet here you are commenting for free! I’m not sure that making a living from Substack is something to complain about, but regarding your other criticisms, no one is suggesting that contamination is the only issue. The post you commented on is about contamination, hence that is the issue discussed. Feel free to peruse my archive for discussion of other issues. Also, I have not commented on motive in this post, So I don’t agree with your claim that accident is implied (or not). See

’s discussion of the snap gene tool for suggestion of intent.

Regarding your claim that

’s report uses fluorometry, you ommitted mention of his qPCR findings. Did you read the report and the article? All testing methods used are discussed in both.