robertsaltzman.substack…
Rupert Peene
Not wanting to intrude with unnecessary talk, but still wishing to participate, i would like to point out a few sentences that are light and lively as well as encouraging. The idea and the experience of emptiness is leavening; it lifts the spirit and advocates play.
"This sense of centrality is real. What is questionable is the further assumption that it refers to a fixed, independent subject underlying experience.”
“What exists is a process, a configuration of experience with continuity but no identity. Experience does not belong to a self; the sense of self arises as part of experience.”
“This does not mean that the self is unreal. The experience of being a self is real. The illusion is the notion that this experience refers to a fixed thing.”
“There is no hidden witness standing apart from this process, no final metaphysical ground waiting to be discovered. There is only what is happening, as it happens.”
Rupert—
Thank you. Not an intrusion in the least. Those passages do point to something important, and I’m glad you singled them out.
What those passages are doing is limiting the question of selfhood to what can actually be described without consolation or metaphysical surplus. The sense of centrality is part of experience, not something to be argued away. What’s under examination is the further move that treats that experience as evidence of a fixed subject standing behind it.
If this is experienced as light, playful, or even ironic, it’s not because anything has been added, but because the demand for a fixed referent has dropped away. Caring doesn’t disappear, but it no longer needs to be anchored in an identity. What remains can feel improvisational, not because it is unconstrained, but because it is no longer defending a center.
Nothing is added. Nothing is preserved. When the demand for a center drops away, experience continues without explanation, without appeal, without residue. It moves because it moves.