I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
Childhood instability consistently correlates with future substance abuse, risky behaviors, and incarceration. In contrast, childhood poverty does not predict any of those outcomes. When you control for family income, childhood instability still predicts detrimental consequences.
I went to high school in a very wealthy area — a lot of the kids were really screwed up. Parental narcissism and absence is a serious issue among the affluent.
How do you define childhood instability so that it has a consistent measurable definition? Because only then is it even possible to map a correlation. Also plenty of people who had unstable childhoods don’t go onto abuse substances etc… this is a watered down version of Steven Pinker’s Blank Slate book basically.
Sure, and does poverty correlate with childhood instability. Any chance that not being poor in a poor neighbourhood kinda helps with stability statistically?