GAO dismissed a protest that a “super sub” would be doing most of the work for the service-disabled veteran-owned firm on a VA construction contract. GAO ruled that the alleged statements by the subcontractor did not demonstrate that the awardee falsely certified compliance with the limitations on subcontracting. The protestor had argued that the winning bidder would not perform at least 15% of the construction work. But GAO, reading the clause closely, found that the clause caps payment to non-SDVOSB contractors rather than requiring a specific percentage of work to be performed by the awardee. Sigo Valiant JV, LLC, B-424103, Feb. 24, 2026. gao.gov/products/b-4241…