I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period
So are we still more upset about Diverse, but qualified, yet presumed unqualified hires, than DUI hires?
(Asking for anyone who cares about US National Security)
Pete Hegseth needs to go for the safety of the United States & the allies that we still have.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
To all those who say Trump has “single-handedly” wrecked the economy: He didn’t do it single-handedly. Congress could’ve stopped him anytime. The Republican-led Congress allowed him to wreck the economy.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
Pope Francis lifted the world as he led the Church with his profound moral voice. As he returns to God, may his call to humility and concern for the least among us continue to resound.
World-class writing
The best stories, ideas, and culture right at your fingertips.
There’s a term in psychology called habituation: the way we stop noticing things we see often. A painting on the wall. A familiar view. Even a person’s kindness.
The brain filters the predictable to save energy. But in doing so, it risks filtering out what makes life feel full.
Not everything that becomes familiar should be forgotten.
Sometimes, attention is an act of love.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
“ To put this more simply: opening a Starbucks in a neighborhood creates start-ups in that neighborhood. And that’s because Starbucks acts as a third place, creating opportunities for felicitous connection and fruitful cooperation. After all, if you want to meet and talk about a business idea, but you don’t have an office yet, where do you go?”
“ Importantly, when Starbucks enters neighborhoods with existing coffee shops, there is no significant effect on entrepreneurship, suggesting the impact …
I think in part the fact that rejected Starbucks openings are factored in as a control that this is partially counted into the measurement. Additionally, it appears that startup density per year increases with time since the space opens, which indicates that it is partially a causal, or at least time-correlated factor.
A logical counter explanation, to your point, would be that geographic locations sponsoring the opening of a Starbucks may also be making a general investment in local businesses, and as a result we see startup density in general increase.
“ A logical counter explanation, to your point, would be that geographic locations sponsoring the opening of a Starbucks may also be making a general investment in local businesses, and as a result we see startup density in general increase.”
Yes, and you also need to explore whether rejected Starbucks openings are really random and whether those neighborhoods are in fact good controls.
I have always looked up to Krugman (he even wrote my AP economics textbook!) and he just featured my analysis heavily in his latest blog post… feeling a little bit star-struck this morning
All right, I have a long newsletter for you this morning, weighing in on some recent debates among Democrats. It covers a lot of ground, and it’s one of those times when I’m going to play the Read-The-Whole-Thing-In-Context Card rather than give you a snappy summary.