I don't follow the no-free-will argument. If I put someone in a maze, they can freely choose how to navigate it. If I change the maze while they're in it, I haven't removed their ability to make choices. They might have to reverse or modify their decisions, or even get stuck so no choice is a good one, but I haven't removed their ability to choose, just changed the viable options. Reality is a very large maze, true, where the walls are laws, but I don't see how it’s fundamentally a different situation.