Comment
The app for independent voices
New here. What’s it take to get canceled on Notes?
Your perspective matters. Whether you’re a pro or just passionate, FAIR wants to hear from you.
Submit your article today: submissions@fairforall.org
Let’s bring fairness, understanding, and humanity to the forefront. 🌍
It’s a bleak end-of-March kind of day outside. Nothing like a lovely ancient tune to chase the gloom away!
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
A look at the career and thoughts of Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Great discussions
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.
One of my favorite features of the current op is that we're told both "We have no idea what they are" and "They pose no threat or cause for concern." Those seem a bit at odds, no?
We live in a Republic, not a "democracy".
Way on the plus side, it would appear that only 70% of our citizens took the jab (voluntarily or not).
Based on all the coercion applied, I would have expected it to be over 90%.
And - to once again state the obvious - that "vaccine" they attempted to force on everyone was unproven and could never have been used except for the weasels at the FDA giving their partners in crime an "Emergency Use Authorization" to bypass adequate testing and product liability.
Could be mistaken, but I think the numbers were 82% taking at least one shot, so 18% purebloods. Less than one in five to carry on.
ATM - that's an interesting angle, never looked at it like that.
But if culling was the intent, which I personally think it was/is, it makes no sense to cull a small minority - the 18%.
"The vaccine was not for Covid, Covid was for the vaccine." ~ Lugh
I think his line of reasoning is correct - no one died of what they call "Covid" - a scare tactic, so the non-critical thinkers would clamor for the "vaccine", in other words, the kill shots.
I personally know many who have died "unexpectedly", or fr…
~ Cull Streak Cake Mix ~
It seems kind of contradictory to both attempt to cull and import a whole bunch of immigrants. What's your take on that?
Also, it doesn't seem to be working, if this thing is any indication:
(Of course that's just the global population but, apparently, 'developed' countries' birth-rates had been falling long before C19.)
I'm waiting for you to tell me that the turbo cancers and heart attacks are just getting going. (That could be, but other, similar/related things could fold in like the assorted ingredients of a cake mix.)
While I wait, I'll add that population might take a dive anyway, due in part to peak oil having come and gone and general civilizational decline and/or collapse and the wars, diseases and social unrests that can come of those.
It's a bit like the climate-change FUD where, if civilization is running out of oil, etc., we'll be 'responding to climate-change' anyway.
Or like telling someone to leave when they're already heading toward the door. Kind of baked-in.
We won't need any girls with knitted brows from Sweden, huffing and puffing and brow-beating us about it.
Question: Do our local grocery, etc., stores owe us a living? What about those who constitute our governments? What happens when/if they fold up for good overnight?
---
Cull Streak