Clint, I have appreciated your YT videos displaying affection and love between men. For me love is love, whether sexual or not. Many men today avoid physical displays of such affection because they don't want to be labeled as gay (not that there is anything wrong with being gay or bisexual)

I came to your substack because I dislike the weird US attitude about nudity (why do people focus on nipple, buttock cracks, pubic hair and flaccid cocks?). In the days when men were showering in the nude, swimming in the nude, we gays were being censored and called porny for producing athletic, body-building, photos which had to use cock socks or something (which in fact drew extra attention to the crotch). Nudity (male or female) for me has always been common in art for centuries. It can be erotic but is rarely pornographic. I dislike censorship, in this case on YT. I can see that we should not expose porn to children but this prudity, much more common in the US - unlike Europe - unnecessary and outdated, in my opinion. If I want erotic stimulation, porn is readily accessible for free. I am not seeking it in the artistic and tender images of your video complilations of photos. Yes, uncensored images including cocks are nice, too, but for me it is the absence of censorship that is the greater attraction. Much love.