๐ฆ๐ผ๐ณ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ช๐ถ๐น๐น ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ญ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ต๐
This is what Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week. His exact words: โI think we might be 6 to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all of what SWEs do end-to-end.โ
It is a bold prediction, but the headlines omit the part about others' views.
Demis Hassabis, Nobel Prize-winning CEO of Google DeepMind, said current AI is โ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณโ human-level intelligence. He gives AGI a 50% chance within the decade and says we need โone or two more breakthroughsโ beyond existing technology.
Yann LeCun, Turing Award winner and former Meta AI chief, went further. He called the industry โ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ ๐๐๐-๐ฑ๐ช๐ญ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ฅโ and stated that large language models will never achieve human-level intelligence.
Three of the most respected minds in AI. Fundamentally incompatible views. Same stage.
The headlines also skip what Amodei actually described. His engineers โ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ธ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฏ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฆ.โ They let the model write it. They edit it. They do โ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ด ๐ข๐ณ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ช๐ต.โ But this means, obviously, that it is not a replacement. That is role transformation. The engineer is still there, and important.
We have seen this pattern before. Self-driving cars were supposed to be here by 2018. Level 5 autonomy was โ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ข๐ณ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ.โ Tesla still requires hands on the wheel. LeCun put it like this: ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐น๐ผ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐. There is a considerable distance between a demo and a system you put in peopleโs hands daily.
But let's consider who benefits from this story. Amodei runs a company valued in the billions, competing for talent, funding, and market standing against OpenAI and Google. Bold predictions attract attention, investment, and impetus to adopt their products. This is not a conspiracy. This is an incentive structure. ๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด, ๐ฎ๐๐ธ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด.
The fundamental transformation is already here. AI coding tools make developers more productive. Anthropicโs Cowork product was built in a week and a half, almost entirely with their AI tools. But someone still decided what to build. Someone evaluated if it worked. Someone made architectural decisions. Someone owned the outcome.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ. That requires different skills. No skills.
The question is not whether AI will change software engineering. It already has. The question is whether, 12 months from now, we will look back on this prediction the way we look at 2018's self-driving promises.
What do you think, is this a transformation or a hype cycle?