I remember thinking conceptually of the Spirit as a “bridge” between the father and the son, thus making the spirit both common to the father and the son, but also of the same essence due to The Spirit’s ability to be a part of that communion. Sounds like jargon but yeah.
In my head (at that time anyway), I thought of the Spirit as a “platform” for all of Gods work. Just conceptually.
Kinda like when you say the spirit is the common love between the father and son.
Apr 15
at
9:44 PM
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.