What’s the single most important metric you look at when evaluating whether a company is a true compounder vs. a cyclical pretender?
For us, it comes back to incremental returns on capital. Not what the business earned on its legacy base, but what it’s earning on every new dollar deployed.
A high ROIC on a shrinking capital base is a melting ice cube with good optics. A moderate ROIC on a rapidly expanding reinvestment runway is where the real wealth gets built.
What’s your filter?
Apr 5
at
6:36 PM
Relevant people
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.