Figure AI raised at $39 billion with minimal revenue. The number invites comparison to the autonomous vehicle correction that preceded it.
Cruise accumulated $19 billion in investment before GM shut it down. Argo AI spent $3.6 billion backed by Ford and Volkswagen before closing entirely. The pattern: enormous capital deployed against a technically solvable problem, valuations inflated by narrative and corporate backing, correction triggered when unit economics failed to materialize at scale.
Physical AI companies with revenue tell a different story. Symbotic generates $676 million per quarter manufacturing warehouse robots that automate distribution centers. Intuitive Surgical earns $2.77 billion quarterly from surgical systems installed in hospitals. Teradyne's robotics division produces $1.28 billion per quarter. These companies survived because they crossed the revenue line before the correction arrived.
The humanoid robotics sector is pre-revenue at AV-era valuations. Figure at $39 billion, Skild AI at $1.4 billion, NEURA at $1.2 billion — each pricing a future that requires breakthroughs in dexterous manipulation, unstructured navigation, and robust real-world operation. The AV correction suggests these breakthroughs take longer than funding timelines assume.
The investment framework: below the revenue line, physical AI is investable at current valuations. Above it, every dollar carries the risk that the AV correction taught us to price.