That's not really for me to say, as I don't know what options and outlets are available to him and I have no authority in the matter. But in discussion with others here, the common theme that we return to with some regularity is that if people used their influence to sway opinion and were instrumental in carrying water for those who have done so much damage here, there should a commensurate response in reverse, acknowledging that mistake and using it as a springboard to effect change. Maybe I've missed something, but for all the words that have been expressed on the topic, I don't recall ever hearing something as simple as "I was wrong about Scott Walker," or "I trusted Robin Vos, and he failed that test," and other such things that, brief and to the point, do not mince words or leave wiggle room about it. Unless he actually is not there. At any rate that is my answer to your question. Others have their own position on it, but I'm also not the only one who feels the way that I do.