Comment
The app for independent voices
wow, a Super Eyepatch Wolf shoutout
I think the “Seeker Church Movement” side of the Church Growth Movement did much damage to Anglicanism, or, here in the States, Episcopalianism.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
Great discussions
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.
An upcoming multi part “as we go along” investigation into China’s spending habit on the network and cyber front based on public procurement tenders.
Am somewhat surprised hearing nada about the $1.4 trillion spending spree congress went on that Texas AG Paxton convinced SCOTUS was unconstitutional. Nary a peep have I heard and that is odd.
Exactly! Zero, Zilch, Nada!
I've been waiting for some legal minded commentators to explain the scope and effect of that case!!!
It is small and limited to one issue Paxton sued on. See my other post. Otherwise the media would be having a hissy-fit.
Are we talking about the same thing? A trillion dollar vote by a House lacking aa quorum, in fact, less than 1/2 present? That is small one issue.. I would say the only issue
I'm with you on this, as usual. I can only think that Paxton felt he had a chance of success if he made it about specific ramifications to the state of TX.
"When President Joe Biden signed the illegally passed law, Attorney General Paxton sued and sought an injunction against the implementation of certain provisions of the law affecting the State of Texas." Here is the decision -
This is from Ken Paxton's office (and I find it sort of misleading as to what TX and no one else gained) - texasattorneygeneral.go…
STANDING!!! But if the quorum rule was violated, why in holy hell does that not apply to the entire thing? Said before, SCOTUS decisions today depend on headlines, not the Constitution
WHERE was "Speaker" Johnson in all this?