Fair enough it seems I wasn’t clear enough I’m saying the queerness is harmful but definitely not as harmful as gangs that’s why I said don’t equivocate intensity in my earlier comment to highlight the indifference it leads to. My apologies for the confusion.

Also I did not say that the existence of queer people leads to societal collapse but its ideology cannot justify morality (What counts as wrong or right). Now I’m not merely stating it as a theological fact allow me to present this argument.

1. Everyone has a basic sense that some things are really right or really wrong.

2. We don’t argue to get this sense we already use it.

3. Moral intuition is not just emotion; it presents actions as binding (Like pedophilia is definitely wrong regardless of how you feel).

4. Having moral intuition alone does not explain why moral rules apply to everyone.

5. Just as eyes need light to see, moral intuition needs a source to know truth.

6. If morality comes from society, feelings, or votes, then it can always change.

7. If it can always change, then moral boundaries are decisions, not truths.

8. Yet people treat harm, consent, and abuse as absolutely wrong, not “wrong for now.”

9. Absolute moral boundaries require a non-contingent, authoritative source.

10. Only a personal, non-contingent source , God, can ground such morality.

Conclusion:

Without God, moral boundaries come from power or agreement; with God, they can be grounded in truth.

Those “arguments for other religions” cannot be true just because they have arguments does not mean it is true. Only Christianity can even justify logic no other religion can. So even if they have said, it doesn’t mean they are true since they can’t even justify logic

Then you saying Christianity is just like any religion is a false assertion consider this argument for theistic beliefs.

1. Logic exists and everyone must use it to think or argue at all.

2. Any view that destroys logic destroys itself.

3. Non-Christian religions explain logic in only three ways.

4. If God had to decide that 2 + 2 equals 4, then it could equal 5, but since it never can, logic isn’t something God invents.

5. Or logic exists above God,

6. Or logic is just part of impersonal reality (everything = God).

7. If God creates logic, then logic could change, which makes reasoning unreliable.

8. If logic is above God, then God is not ultimate.

9. If logic is impersonal or part of the universe, then it changes or disappears.

10. Christianity alone says logic is grounded in God’s eternal rational nature, the Logos, who is Christ.

Conclusion:

Only Christianity can explain logic without destroying it, so Christianity is true.

From these arguments you can see why I’m making an objective claim and why it’s justified. Now explain to me why your assertions are justified.