Thanks TC, you've done a great job of wrapping up a few different sources that many of us seem to be following now, and I found this article helpful in putting to rest some of my thinking on the abundance of information today (9:30 pm here). I'm quite stunned by the revelation of the potential repercussions that “The Loose Cannon Rule" has set for every criminal case involving physical evidence. Also hoping that the consequences of this judge acting beyond the bounds of her constitutional remit are swift and severe. Probably not but, as her seniors and betters have said, it is inconceivable that such an upstart should breach the separation of powers in this way. Regarding the "leak" about "nuclear capabilities of a foreign ally," well maybe I'm just getting more suspicious-minded with age but something smells funny to me. The timing is good for the typical red herring dragged across the trail distraction we've seen used before. Get the medias and everyone talking about some other "shiny" thing than what Sleepy Joe and the wokes want. The side effects of it causing concern among America's allies, and damage to international relations, well that's just added bonus. How many diplomats have already quietly asked "Is it us?" The leak could even be a lie, would that be such a surprise? The tip wasn't sent from a burner phone in Little Moscow was it?