“I believe that all courts, all over the world, have different modus operandi, which is why a power of attorney is only valid in the country in which it was issued. When Mark Abraham believes that the court does not trust him, it is probably not because the court has anything against him as a person, but rather because he is not represented by a Danish lawyer who knows the rules of the game, and then not to forget that the arguments he presents, probably helped along the way by AI and perhaps the Romanian lawyer on the board, are perhaps just not strong enough?”
The issue here is that when we had Danish representation we lost, when we had outside council we won. :)
Actually I think you are right regarding the Modus Operandi, we are very good at putting things in writing. The Lower Court decides mostly on oral discussion, the High Court exclusively in writing.
But let's agree on a fact. A main market company cannot be bankrupt without a proper hearing. No matter what is the financial standing of the company a proper hearing is necessary. How do you fix the company if the decision was wrong? How can you fix Shape? Do you fix it by bankrupting it again? Is this the right way?
May 12
at
8:39 AM
Relevant people
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.