Since the release of the Durham Report on May 15, 2023 large Western media outlets have for the most part done nothing but criticise the report for its so-called inability to justify its four-year investigation into FBI misconduct and that the fact that only three names were mentioned for criminal prosecution, with two being thrown out of court, shows that the investigation had little evidence to justify its inquiry to begin with.
I'm just still reeling from the non-reaction across the media spaces to the FBI's launch of its own autonomous foreign policy back in February. Check out this articlette in The TransAtlantic…
Hi William thanks for your response. I completely agree with you that the intelligence agencies have not been created to protect the people and I thought that would have been evident if you are familiar with my work, I have written about this in several pieces, including on the origins of the FBI here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-americas-secret-police-c7d and on the origins of MI5 here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/operation-gladio-how-nato-conducted. Clearly the intelligence agencies were not created to protect the people but that is how they have been legally justified and they have been in violation of their charter so it is not irrelevant to bring this up. The Horowitz Report had already put the FBI under pressure, the Durham Report if people know how to use this can add pressure to make a serious reform of the FBI, this is the point. Bringing up stuff that happened over 100 years ago is not going to back a reform of the FBI today.
??? William you are free to unsubscribe at any time to my substack. I consider myself a writer and researcher. If you are not interested in facts and data you can go back to reading short sentences on Twitter.
Yes!!!
I'm just still reeling from the non-reaction across the media spaces to the FBI's launch of its own autonomous foreign policy back in February. Check out this articlette in The TransAtlantic…
https://thetransatlantic.substack.com/p/so-the-fbi-has-a-foreign-policy-now?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Hi William thanks for your response. I completely agree with you that the intelligence agencies have not been created to protect the people and I thought that would have been evident if you are familiar with my work, I have written about this in several pieces, including on the origins of the FBI here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-americas-secret-police-c7d and on the origins of MI5 here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/operation-gladio-how-nato-conducted. Clearly the intelligence agencies were not created to protect the people but that is how they have been legally justified and they have been in violation of their charter so it is not irrelevant to bring this up. The Horowitz Report had already put the FBI under pressure, the Durham Report if people know how to use this can add pressure to make a serious reform of the FBI, this is the point. Bringing up stuff that happened over 100 years ago is not going to back a reform of the FBI today.
??? William you are free to unsubscribe at any time to my substack. I consider myself a writer and researcher. If you are not interested in facts and data you can go back to reading short sentences on Twitter.
Glad to hear it was a misunderstanding William, thank you for clarifying.