16 Comments

So, in short, HCQ is quite effective at treating COVID. Good to know, 2.5 years and a million deaths later. Too bad Fauci and friends withheld this life-saving medicine from the world.

Expand full comment

Probably because they knew it works and wanted it for themselves. I believe they would never have released the bioweapon unless they had something safe and widely available to protect themselves. Hence why they flew a wobbly over Zelenko and Trump re HCQ. You don't want the world's population knowing the antidote when you are trying to democide them.

Expand full comment

And that it may not be effective in treating those with healthy cholesterol levels. But wait, the study pointed out that transient blood cholesterol levels may be different than those found in organ cell tissue (which makes sense if anyone has ever played around with diet prior to a cholesterol test.) So HCQ trial results that showed little effect, contrary to in vitro tests, may have been skewed by participants in metabolic health. Fascinating to see in the study how much they know and how much they are still trying to understand how the mechanisms of medicines, some we've been taking for years, actually work.

Expand full comment

And the censorship continues about it. I got dinged on Facebook for sharing “disinformation “

Expand full comment

They already knew in 2005 that it might work: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

Yet there came the self-declared "fact checkers" basically stating this is wrong because it's a different virus and it's also wrong because the 3-letter-agencies said so: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-chloroquine-sars-covid-19/fact-check-chloroquine-sars-study-does-not-prove-hydroxychloroquines-effectiveness-against-covid-19-idUSKCN2512A7

This is how The Science™ works nowadays.

Expand full comment

I got that fact check within 30 seconds of posting that article. The censorship is still so strong it’s ridiculous

Expand full comment

There are no profits in hydroxychloroquine for Fauci, Walensky, Bourla or Bancel. Also, Trump recognised its potential and wanted it used to save lives. That's why it was withheld. The profits are from coercing the unwilling to be jabbed with vaccines or medicines produced at warp speed. The precedent has been set. Waiting for years for a vaccine or new drug to go through extensive trials is over.

Expand full comment

What exactly does that mean I am not following it as it relates to cholesterol?

Expand full comment

Read the paper that he links in here (source).

Expand full comment

It is great hearing about HCQ benefits in preventing the poison but for most people on the planet it is still difficult, if not impossible, to obtain. The medical profession are still gatekeepers in most countries and those gatekeepers are mostly still counting their jab cash.

Expand full comment

Dr Alexander, how can I get some information from you to defend the re long covid idea - who's getting it most, shots before or after getting covid, etc? I just didn't know how to ask you this. I'm on Oregon dealing with OHA (Oregon health association - grrr) and people are so fooled by the Oregon propaganda! It's been a nightmare what they are doing here.

Expand full comment

Yep! But it’s not a patented drug that makes a lot of money for big Pharma so out the door it goes!

Expand full comment

It's an embarrassment of riches, not that Fauci & Bourla have such contrite human emotions, of all the inexpensive remedies for viruses in general.

Expand full comment

I'm posting a link to a new film that came out this week by the great guys at Oracle films. This is an absolutely brilliant piece of work and should be shared the world over. Titled ' Safe & Effective - a second opinion.'

heres the link (I put the Youtube link, if they take it down it should be found on rumble etc )

PLEASE SHARE 🙏

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o&t=18s

Expand full comment

can't say this in ca.

Expand full comment

Dr. Alexander, May I have your email?

Expand full comment