24 Comments

Matthew, I don't know how to reach my friends who were not scientists.

My scientist friends were initially fooled, but a single phone call set them on a course of discovery and, interestingly, we came to similar conclusions after each studied the data. At least we can discuss the topics with clarity and ease.

On the other hand, the repeated nonsense spouted by the "news" has an iron grip on my friends who do not have scientific training.

The part that caused me concern are scientists (not my friends) who are convinced by the nonsense or afraid. I don't understand how they can't grasp the data. Maybe many are not looking?

Expand full comment

Not many connect dots like you connect dots.

Expand full comment
Jan 31, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

Gotta say, nothing about the past 3 years had anything to do with health. Nothing. Well, except maybe those confused doctors who had the audacity to actually treat patients, and expected to be be honored as saviors, and instead are at risk of losing their medical licenses.

Military operation? Now, that makes sense. WTF???

Expand full comment

As you may have gathered, my take on world events is largely filtered through the lens of Biblical prophecy. It is unquestionably an “a-priori” bias and I’m happy to state it upfront. In that regard, much of what you write about lines up well with many conservative schools of thinking regarding eschatology or “end-times” theology. The CDBC meshes perfectly with much-hyped “mark of the beast” and it’s associated control of global trade, for example.

In that regard, Israel is a key player with an enormous target on her back - for a multitude of reasons; both religious and economic. The land has been a centre of conflict for millennia, and now, with it’s burgeoning technological and natural resources, has to be a serious source of ‘plunder at the ready’ for those who would desire it. Thus you mention Russia’s incursions into the Ukraine and Syria. With those areas under Russian control, the path is clear for the bear to move south. Together with Iran (Persia) perhaps. Now where have we read about that before?

Expand full comment

The old saying goes "All wars are bankers' wars." (I reckon the author must be either Sun Tzu or Groucho, or anyone in a neighborhood of those two)

I propose a candidate for Level 4: if you defend yourself from US bullying you with viruses, then we will attack your country.

I expect, and I desire strongly to be wrong, that in the next two decades we are going to go from plandemonium to plandemonium, all fake, all about plunder, all about grinding people down psychologically producing horrible effects (remember what D. Rancourt always tells about hierarchy.) The moment one country stands up and says no to American USG globalist bullshit, they will get attacked financially and then militarily. At least, that's the fear. And politicians not only are evil and dumb, they are also cowards.

Expand full comment

Spot on, Matt. I'll see your 4 and raise you one. So Level 3 is very inefficient on its own.

Level 4 is the countermeasures (jabs) that bypass the need for viral replication and contagion by training the human cell to make the most damaging part of the GoF virus, Spike, the portion of the virus that is only communicable in the viral replication phase of Covid-19. While Spike may be spread in the late stages of Covid-19 through shedding of Spike without the virion, such is a very minor probability, and spread of the virus itself is practically eliminated once the disease is no longer primarily respiratory.

The countermeasures are the most efficient and reliable method of spreading Spike and directly eliminating the offspring of those who are jabbed. Plus, the fertility of the population is multiplied by the square of the proportion that are unjabbed because the probability of two unjabbed people finding each other and mating is the product of the probability of any one member of the population being unjabbed. Thus, if only 50% of the youthful population is jabbed, the probability of a couple being totally free of the jab is 25%. If 30% are [edit: un]jabbed, the probability of a couple being free is 9% and so on. Of course, that's a simplified portrait as not all the jabbed are infertile and there are potential effects of shedding on the unjabbed, but you get the picture I'm sure.

The effect on fertility is a big reason why the jab project is continued at all costs even though the longer it is continued the more likely the intelligent will wake up and revolt. It's also the reason the "boosters" contain 50% mRNA that translate to the original Spike, even though the original strain has died out. As the virus has evolved to Omicron, its lethality (and likely that of Spike itself) has declined. So it's important the jabs continue to create the original Spike. The other big reason is of course the financial incentive of getting the jabs on the childhood schedule to solidify immunity, which would otherwise expire when the emergency ends and the EUAs are withdrawn.

Another interesting aspect is the resistance of the Global South to the jab program, their resulting continued fecundity and the encouragement of migration into the wealthy nations targeted by the jab program. "These people" are regarded as inferior by the eugenicists in global control. They are seen as ideal "epsilons" for Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" until such time as epsilons are replaced by robots.

Expand full comment

Life was so much less complicated when oil and weapons were all we needed....

Expand full comment

Matthew, with respect to Level 5ish, you ought to talk to Ed Dowd, who shares your take on this. I think that would be an interesting podcast.

Expand full comment

good interview yesterday

Expand full comment

Can someone flesh out the military-banking reason for me? How is this benefitting the military banking complex?

It does seem like it was meant to warm us up to a new form of totalitarian society, where all resources are centrally controlled and rationed. We've heard more than one world leader even refer to getting used to "the new world order" in the context of obeying covid edicts.

Expand full comment

Fascinating interview. It was obvious from the outset that the narrative of the Las Vegas shooting made no sense. Yet if the intention was to assassinate MBS, why shoot up the concert? Was this to be a distraction? Interesting the story of the .308 shots to the fuel tanks. Only a marksman could reliably make two hits out of eight at 700 yds. But even a military-grade round would have insufficient energy to penetrate a steel tank at that range. Also creepy is the Gates connection. This whole story is too strange.

Expand full comment

> I'll leave it to readers to imagine why Russia might want to be involved (in Syria and Ukraine) even aside from the Ukrainian biolabs that seem like a violation of the West's agreement not to encroach.

One of the reasons Russian is in Syria is Assad as the leader of Syria asked Russia to help Syria. Not so the USA. The US invaded and has been stealing Syria's Oil.

> A laboratory built under a French Health Minister who is mad, mad, mad about vaccines—and slipped Andrew Hill $40 million to mumble and babble about. A laboratory whose chief scientist was trained by Ralph Baric. A laboratory that gives the West a Level 2 fallback plan when the Level 1 debate is allowed to fade.

I am not buying the lab leak hypothesis. The work by Ron Unz and later "Pure Viral Swarms" by JJ Couey, makes Ron's work sound. The Link:

https://www.unz.com/runz/why-the-lab-leak-theory-is-almost-certainly-false/

Please take the time to make a point by point refutation of Ron's work.

> One way or another, it's always about the military-banking complex, stupid.

couldn't agree more.

Be well.

Expand full comment

You're making my head spin again, Mathew. All plausible. I did not know the DIA was bigger than all the other spook agencies put together. Sheesh!

Expand full comment

Matthew, in a comment one time, I mentioned the time period period (14 days in most jurisdictions) in which cases, serious cases, and deaths with a C19 positive test are counted as "unvaccinated" (if that is a word). It seems to me that this would skew the data toward increased shot effectiveness. You corrected me on this. I don't understand how this doesn't have a significant effect assuming there are a significant number of cases/deaths during this period. Could you elaborate on this please?

Thank you.

Expand full comment

"One way or another, it's always about the military-banking complex, stupid."

Yup

Expand full comment