0:00
/
0:00
Transcript
0:00
SPEAKER 3
The United States Supreme Court is hearing the case U.S. v. Scrimeti on December 4th. This case will determine if states like Tennessee have the right to regulate medical interventions for minors like puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgery.
0:18
SPEAKER 2
December 4th is the day that the court will hear oral arguments in this very important case. which means it's a day to show the public that gays, lesbians, and our allies will not allow this human rights abuse and medical scandal to continue.
0:32
SPEAKER 1
We need everyone who cares about the health of children, about science and truth, about gays and lesbians to travel to DC for the day. We know that this will be a historic and critical event for the national media.

We may be outnumbered and outspent, but we have courage and medical evidence on our side. The ACLU and Lambda Legal have vast resources, funded by large corporations and some with questionable motives. They will likely try to paint a picture of broad public support for their position. They will seek to make this is a show- that the rainbow glitter world is on their side- when we know all they have is a trail of harmed proto gay children's bodies and destroyed families. The truth is on our side.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday, December 4th, 2024 in Washington D.C.

We urgently need your support if you care about the well-being of children, believe in science and truth, and value the rights of lesbians and gay men.

We are fundraising to cover permits, travel and accommodation assistance for those attending, and to create impactful signs. Our goal is to show that and lesbians are fighting back, that parents are fighting back, that we are a broad coalition. 

If you can travel to D.C. and want to join us, please contact lgbtcouragecoaltion@gmail.com

Discussion about this video

I tried to reply to your email, but the address is missing a letter so it didn't go through. Hopefully this will get you more replies!

Expand full comment

According to this article in CNN, some Republicans support the US side in this case because they want to protect parents' rights to make decisions regarding their children's health care. I understand that to mean these Republican believe parents should be able to access PGC if they think it will benefit their child. I'm confused, because in states where PGC is legal, aren't parents powerless to prevent their minor children from accessing it because it's considered a civil right, not just health care? I have read many stories of parents losing custody of their children if they would not agree to PGC. Why aren't Republicans talking about that loss of parental rights?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/27/politics/parental-rights-transgender-skrmetti-case-supreme-court

Expand full comment

Oops. I see it. Its missing an ‘i’

Expand full comment

My reply to you via the email link got rejected as not existing. I see a comment above for same. Can you correct?

Expand full comment

I can't see Barrett, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh supporting youth gender medicine or believing in such a thing as true trans. It is to be hoped that they did not select as clerks social justice warriors who will try to queer the justices' thinking. If Roberts wasn't willing to support marriage equality, he probably won't endorse the most pernicious element of the trans agenda.

Expand full comment

Is there a way to make a donation without the qr code? A link perhaps? thanks

Expand full comment

The GiveSendGo fund for this demonstration is here: https://www.givesendgo.com/skrmetti

Expand full comment