Note: This article is primarily a human story. The most important parts of this article are the videos (if you only have time to watch one, watch Maddie’s, below) that were compiled and edited for this article. The written details are just to provide the necessary context for the significance of their testimonies.
In the first part of this series, I discussed how the gross malfeasance observed by many in the COVID-19 vaccine trials did not come out of nowhere. Rather, it is yet one more occurrence in a chronic pattern of egregious conduct by the pharmaceutical industry, which has progressively worsened because there has not been the political will to address the growing corruption within the biomedical establishment.
There, I focused upon the events within the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine trials (and the subsequent red flags which emerged after they entered the market), because many at the time had difficulty believing something like that could even happen and it was possible to sweep the issue under the rug, since the vaccines were only targeted on one segment of the population—women. Now, not only has the exact same thing happened (to a very eerie degree) with the COVID vaccines across the globe, but what is happening now is even worse than what happened less than a decade ago.
The best metaphor I have come up with to describe what I’ve observed in the pharmaceutical clinical trial process is that enrolling in one is akin to entering an abusive relationship. The abuser will initially flatter you and promise you one thing after another in return for your consent to enter their web of deception. Then, once they have you, they will break each promise they made, gradually treating you worse and worse, and gaslighting you into believing that those issues are not really happening. Finally, once they no longer need you, they will discard you and leave you to pick up the pieces (which is often almost impossible if you have a life-changing medical injury).
“Hard” and “Soft” Fraud in Clinical Trials
In the previous article, I introduced the concept of two different types of scientific fraud:
•Soft fraud is when the data is presented misleadingly to propose a conclusion that's not supported by the data, or some of the data is intentionally omitted (e.g., you do not publish an incriminating study or you find a way to reclassify an adverse event so it does not show up in the final clinical trial report).
•Hard fraud is when the data itself is just fabricated.
While many are comfortable with committing "soft” fraud, very few will commit “hard” fraud (although this cannot necessarily be said of India or China). Instead, most of the fraud we encounter is soft fraud (e.g., this characterizes many of the studies used to try to debunk hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19). This, in turn, makes it possible for outside investigators (e.g., this community) to read between the lines, identify what actually happened, and determine what the results of a given study should have been, had it not been twisted to provide the results desired by its sponsor.
Conversely, I believe that the general reluctance to commit hard fraud exists because it crosses a line that even the fairly corrupt academic and legal systems still stand behind. However, we frequently see things that come quite close to that line, such as dishonest researchers altering a trial midway through so it arrives at the needed results. Fauci, for example, did this repeatedly with remdesivir to get it onto the market, and similarly, the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer ended their previously promised long-term placebo groups once they got their emergency-use authorizations (which should have required that long-term follow-up), so the long-term side effects of these vaccines could never be assessed.
Note: Although you can conceal most things by manipulating clinical trials, the one thing that is very difficult to hide is the total number of deaths (as they cannot be reclassified to something else). When Pfizer prematurely ended their trial at 6 months, more people had died in the vaccine group than the placebo group (and I suspect that this would have further worsened with time). The report disclosing this inconvenient fact (which destroyed the entire rationale for vaccine mandates) was released over a year ago.
Much of modern (industry-sponsored) science is designed to conceal things that would create problems for those sponsoring the science. Similarly, an ethos has been installed within our culture to doubt our own observations, and instead defer to the evidence-based scientific consensus, as the former, but not the latter is allegedly highly susceptible to biases that invalidate its conclusions. I disagree with this, and would argue that important things can often only be discerned by perceptive anecdotal observations.
Many organized religions throughout history have sought to control their populations by monopolizing the truth, and modern science is no different, monopolizing the evidence so that only a costly industry narrative can constitute "truth.” All of this is why we repeatedly see situations where someone has an undeniable medical injury, and afterwards, every professional they talk to tells them the injury could not have possibly been linked to the medication because there is “no evidence” it could have happened (also known as medical gaslighting).
With the COVID-19 vaccines, we have seen alarming evidence of their harm across the board. For example, so many people are being harmed that VAERS has received more serious adverse events from the COVID vaccines than all other vaccines in history--28% of Americans know someone whom they believe the vaccines killedThe life insurance industry shows an unprecedented spike in deaths amongst working-age Americans following workplace-mandated vaccines being forced upon them. However, all of these safety signals are being ignored and dismissed as erroneous products of cognitive biases because they don’t meet the elusive bar for “evidence.”
Our current society has been conditioned to worship “evidence-based” science, and believes that it should be the sole arbiter of truth. One of the core tenets of evidence-based medicine is that the best available evidence should be used to inform clinical decisions. This is now widely interpreted to mean that large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or clinical guidelines produced by committees of (often corrupt) experts are the “best” forms of evidence, and thus are the only things allowed to inform clinical decisions.
One of my largest disagreements with this dogma occurs when a situation arises where observations suggest something inconvenient to commercial interests, but the question at hand has not been formally assessed by large RCTs. The observations are summarily dismissed because “there is no evidence” for them. In these cases, I believe that the more limited data point (e.g., a series of similar clinical cases) constitutes the best available evidence, and should be treated as such until more comprehensive evidence is arrived at through a clinical study.
Much of my success as a clinician has arisen from utilizing more “limited” forms of evidence to inform my clinical decisions rather than waiting for an RCT (which may take years to be done) to settle the question—unfortunately many doctors become paralyzed and cannot act unless they have something like that to back them up. In contrast, if you read medical journals from earlier eras, physicians regularly made remarkable discoveries utilizing inductive reasoning, which is why I frequently study those ancient documents.
Overall, I believe there are three major issues with relying excessively upon RCTs:
•The first, summarized in this essay by Harvey Risch, is that the value of (perfect) RCTs is heavily over-emphasized. In my eyes, most individuals who fixate on RCTs view an investigation being randomized and controlled as a necessary box to check off, rather than (like Risch) actually understanding what it entails from a statistical perspective.
•Secondly, if the magnitude of an effect is small (e.g., this drug might reduce your risk of a heart attack years down the road by 5%), it takes an elaborate and costly trial to detect that faint effect, and it is very likely that you will have a greater chance of being harmed by a side effect than benefiting from the drug. Conversely, if the effect is large (e.g., shooting someone with a gun typically kills them), you don’t need an elaborate trial to detect the effect; a very small one will suffice to identify it. I subscribe to the belief that many useful medical interventions have a large enough magnitude of effect that it is not necessary to do complex testing to tease out their benefits.
•The third point is that large RCTs are extremely expensive to conduct (meaning that only industry and occasionally vested interests within the government can fund them, which is why many therapies I stand behind have never been able to achieve this gold standard in research performed for them). The rarely considered cost of doing an RCT frequently invalidates the entire RCT model, because study after study has shown that the financial interests of a study’s sponsor heavily influence its conclusion, and that influence is much greater than any benefit that can be obtained through randomization or controlling for the placebo effect.
Because of the “sponsor bias”, large studies need to have a way to arrive at a sponsor’s desired conclusion without committing hard scientific fraud. Over the years, a relatively consistent toolbox has evolved for committing soft scientific fraud, and those familiar with it were able to immediately recognize it being applied throughout the COVID-19 clinical trials
The COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
The essential purpose of the COVID-19 vaccine trials was to do the following:
•Be completed in a much shorter time frame than normal so that the vaccines could make it to the market before the pandemic ended on its own (which is essentially what has happened in Africa where vaccines were never used).
Note: The FDA also understood the urgency to open this long-term marketplace and waived a variety of oversights that would normally be required using the present “emergency” as the justification for doing so.
•Come up with something that could be used to justify that the vaccines were “effective” so that the medical profession would wholeheartedly support and promote them.
•Conceal any adverse reactions from the vaccines that would make the medical profession reluctant to recommend the vaccines, and, more importantly, ensure doctors would deny any harms they observed in patients during the rollout could be linked to the vaccine (as doctors acknowledging widespread injuries would destroy the public’s willingness to continue vaccinating).
Long before the vaccines entered the market, I started to see the signs that an elaborate publicity campaign was being put together to frame the vaccines as the miraculous “solution” to the horrific pandemic situation we were experiencing (which was largely self-inflicted). Once the vaccines became available, that publicity campaign kicked into high gear and became the most aggressive propaganda campaign we had ever witnessed in our lifetimes. I tried to cover some of the most insane examples here:
Not surprisingly, this scheme also led to the vaccine manufacturers having the audacity to use titles like “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 [Pfizer] mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine” for the publications of their trials. Simultaneously, we were hit with the same soundbite over and over “well we had hoped the vaccines would be effective, but we never imagined they would be this effective.” My colleagues ate that up, and it became nearly impossible to provide any piece of evidence with which to challenge this modern-day miracle.
Problems With Pfizer’s Trials
Note: I mostly critique Pfizer. This is not because Pfizer is the only bad actor. It’s because I’ve spent the majority of my time reviewing their work (I can’t read everything), and because Pfizer received full approval for their vaccine, it was possible to view many of their regulatory submissions through FOIAs (and their equivalents)
When I read through the Pfizer trial, a few red flags jumped out at me:
•The vaccines were never tested for preventing transmission, and based on their design and my knowledge of precisely how previous vaccines failed to prevent transmission, I did not believe you could take it on faith that the vaccine's efficacy in reducing symptoms translated to the benefit all my colleagues ultimately cared about (reducing the transmission of COVID-19).
•The actual benefits provided by the vaccine were very small. You had to vaccinate 119 people to prevent one minor case of COVID-19 (e.g., a sore throat + a positive test), 2711 people to prevent one “severe” case of COVID-19, and since no deaths were prevented in the trial, well over 21,720 people needed to be vaccinated (21,720 is the total number who were vaccinated in the trial) to prevent a single death from COVID-19.
•Most of the suspected adverse reactions to these vaccines did not appear to have been amongst the adverse events that were monitored (they were also unlikely to appear in the brief timespan of symptoms being monitored within this trial).
•The adverse events that were reported were much higher than what has typically been reported in trials for other vaccines [e.g., 59% experienced fatigue after Pfizer's vaccine, whereas around 10-15% experience fatigue after an influenza vaccine].
•The actual benefit that the vaccines provided was much less than these adverse events that were acknowledged within the trial report. Arkmedic did an excellent breakdown of it here.
•The noteworthy adverse events about which I remembered reading in the online support groups I had joined in 2020 for vaccine trial participants were not accounted for in any of the trial reports I read (Pfizer included). I had joined these online groups because I was suspicious of the vaccines and felt that doing this would be the only way to find out what the pharmaceutical companies had actually done.
From looking at all of this, my immediate thought was “if this was the best they could do using every possible trick at their disposal to rearrange their data to paint a positive picture of the vaccines, just how bad was the actual trial data?”
Unfortunately, my physician colleagues (who frequently lectured us on how to skeptically dissect scientific publications) were so enraptured by the “the vaccine is even more safe and effective than we imagined” meme, that all these points fell on deaf ears. Fortunately, some did notice these issues, and Peter Doshi published a series of editorials (summarized here) in the British Medical Journal (BMJ - considered to be one of the top 5 medical journals in the world) that explained why the design of the vaccine trials and the evidence for Pfizer’s vaccines was very poor, and could not justify an FDA approval. Sadly, his experience with his colleagues mirrored my own, and his points were almost entirely ignored by the medical profession.
One of Doshi’s many observations was that there were signs in the data that the trial was not blinded, and the entire benefit of the vaccine may have been due to a failure to test vaccinated individuals for COVID-19 (thus creating the illusion that vaccinated individuals were less likely to have laboratory-confirmed COVID-19).
Subsequently, a whistleblower, Brook Jackson, who helped run one of Pfizer’s clinical trials, came forward and testified to the following:
•The COVID-19 vaccine trial she participated in was run in a much more haphazard way than any others she had worked on throughout her career.
•The trial was not blinded, and protocols that should have been followed to ensure blinding were flagrantly violated.
•Vaccinated individuals with COVID-19 were not being tested for COVID-19.
•Adverse reactions in vaccinated individuals were not adequately recorded.
Due to a concern that this conduct would violate the FDA’s requirements for clinical trial sites, Brook alerted her superiors about what was happening so that these issues could be addressed. After her pleas repeatedly fell on deaf ears, she eventually notified the FDA directly. Although the FDA did not investigate her concerns, they appeared to have informed her employer, as Brook was terminated the same day.
Note: As detailed by Doshi, there has been a longstanding issue with the FDA providing insufficient oversight for clinical trial sites, and as a separate investigation into vaccine oversight revealed, it was suspected that their laxity in oversight would dramatically worsen during Operation Warp Speed, which was the partnership between the Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Defense(DOD) aimed at helping to accelerate the development of a COVID-19 vaccine.
After these events transpired, Brook submitted her story to the BMJ who corroborated her allegations through documents she provided, and through other employees at the trial site. I would strongly recommend reading the BMJ’s investigation to understand exactly what happened there. Since her termination, Brook filed a whistleblower lawsuit against Pfizer which is presently in the federal courts.
Later, when I reviewed the events with Brook, one of the most interesting things I learned is that most of the data which is collected at clinical trial sites never even makes it to the FDA. Instead the FDA only receive a very small sample of it that is trusted to be representative of everything that occurs. I suspect this is one of the many reasons why the FDA could truthfully claim they had no knowledge any of this happened, although as this article shows they are clearly also culpable since they did not choose to pursue getting the reports for adverse events (like Maddie’s) they knew were happening.
In summary, as you can see from the above information, there was a real risk that soft fraud would occur during the clinical trials. However, unlike the many cases in which this has happened in the past, for the COVID-19 vaccine, we also had the unique opportunity to have numerous whistleblowers come forward and corroborate that this happened for the COVID-19 vaccines.
The COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Strategy
Pfizer and Moderna knew quite early on (although exactly how early is a matter of speculation) that there were serious risks involved in using the mRNA spike protein platform for vaccination (this was also most likely the case for AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson with their spike protein vaccine). This left them in a bit of a bind; how could the vaccines they were committed to making for Operation Warp Speed be “safe” enough to win the vaccine race and get the market share they wanted?
As far as I can tell from reading the preclinical documents (e.g., this one), this was initially accomplished by opting out of much of the safety testing on non-human subjects, which would normally be required before proceeding to human studies (e.g., Pfizer was allowed by regulators to exempt itself from testing for autoimmunity or cancer risks). I took this as a tacit admission that it was known that there were serious issues here (given that there were major concerns with these issues and they have since become some of the most common serious complications of the vaccines). In turn, they concluded that their best option was to never formally test for them so they could plausibly deny knowing that the issue existed (this is a common industry tactic) and claim that there was no evidence that the issue exists.
Once the human trials began, the goal shifted to doing everything possible to minimize the number of inevitable adverse events which occurred. This was essentially accomplished by:
•Making it very difficult for trial subjects to report any complications from the vaccines except for a very narrow subset of symptoms that were not a major publicity issue for the vaccine manufacturers. This characterizes both the limited V-safe data (which was still incriminating enough that a lawsuit was needed to get it from the CDC) and the even more limited list of adverse reactions found within the main section of Pfizer’s clinical trial report [fever, headache, fatigue, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle pain, joint pain, or use of a fever medication along with pain, redness, or swelling at the vaccination site]. Furthermore, all of these symptoms were only monitored for 7 days post- vaccination (many vaccine injuries do not occur within this brief window, which was a well known fact prior to the COVID-19 vaccines).
Note: the more severe injuries in Pfizer’s study were reported in an extremely vague manner (see page 9), which made it impossible to determine anything.
•Aggressively reclassifying each serious complication as unrelated to the vaccines (typically by claiming it was in fact due to a pre-existing psychiatric condition or COVID-19).
•Avoiding any type of long-term followup on patients which could provide incriminating safety data, regardless of prior commitments to do so.
Because of this strategy, the vaccine manufacturers could not acknowledge any complications that research participants experienced as being related to the vaccines. Instead, all they could do was gaslight the patients into believing that the injury was unrelated to the vaccine, and have healthcare providers collude to create the narrative that the injury was not related to vaccination.
One of the cruel complications of this approach was that it required reneging on the promises that were given to the trial subjects at the start of the research study—any medical complications they received would be covered (because providing any type of help would require acknowledging that there were potential complications from the vaccine). The one, possibly unanticipated, downside of choosing not to help with medical expenses accrued in the trial is that it could solicit the outrage necessary for trial participants to speak out publicly about what happened to them, and for the public to listen…which to some extent has now happened.
All of these potential issues were why the BMJ has repeatedly called for the raw data for the COVID-19 vaccine trials to be released. It is almost certain that the scant clinical trial data we have been provided by the pharmaceutical companies is highly misleading, and that lack of information makes it completely unethical to mandate the vaccines on the population. This is especially true because the lack of data acknowledging the injuries makes it impossible for those who are injured to receive any type of medical care or support (hence, why many providers are now labeling vaccine injuries as long-covid, because it represents the best shot they have of getting help).
The COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participants
When you review these cases, it does appear that they were all coordinated as a very similar playbook was used on each participant. However, I believe this was more of an emergent phenomenon because very similar things to the approaches used here have occurred in the past. Much of what follows is déjà vu from Merck’s HPV vaccine trials, and to a lesser extent these examples also match what friends of mine experienced with complications from other pharmaceuticals that were already FDA approved (as doctors are often very resistant to believing drugs they prescribed could cause harm).
For example, many of the adverse events shown below were reclassified as being a complication of pre-existing psychiatric conditions, and this has been the default strategy for gaslighting patients throughout the history of medicine. I believe the new emphasis on reclassifying injuries as COVID-19 resulted from a climate of hysteria, where anything could be labeled as COVID-19 and there is enough of an overlap between spike protein injuries from COVID-19 to the vaccine itself, that it could be rationalized that many vaccine injuries were actually due to the virus.
Maddie’s story
To expand the market for the COVID-19 vaccines, a case needed to be made that they were safe and effective for children (who had for all practical purposes a 0% chance of dying from COVID-19). For this reason, we saw a variety of predatory advertisements such as this one from Pfizer:
An individual who was severely injured in the above trial has dedicated her life to making her story known around the world:
Much of the time that went into this article came from editing Maddie de Garay’s story on the Highwire into a shorter version (as I recognize that while the entire presentation is extremely compelling, far fewer people will watch a full episode—as you’d guess it was extremely challenging to decide which parts to cut out of it).
Because of how important I felt this story was for the world to see, I emailed it to Pierre Kory for him to share it (he has a lot more followers), and I would request that you both watch this and consider sharing it as well, because it has a really powerful message:
Most of what is in this video should speak for itself. A few additional things I’d add though:
•Maddie’s attitude is remarkable. I am genuinely amazed that she is not more bitter about her situation, especially given how healthy and active she was before her injury (it is incredibly difficult for people who have serious injuries to come to terms with what has happened to them, and accept that they can no longer do what they had previously been able to do). Instead, she is almost entirely focused on preventing others from also experiencing her nightmare.
•One of the issues highlighted in the Real Anthony Fauci is that Fauci has developed a network of principal investigators (PIs) to conduct questionable research trials for his drugs.
•There is absolutely no question that Maddie’s PI, Dr. Frenck, knew what her injury was the moment it started (as it had previously been reported in many adults), knew what it meant for Pfizer if the injury was acknowledged by the trial (given how few people were in the trial), and that he had enough influence to shape the medical process which Maddie received so that it would not be something that had to go in the clinical trial report. His choice to initiate this coverup resulted in necessary care (which could have prevented her paralysis) being delayed until it was too late, and he is directly responsible for what happened to Maddie.
•The allergist that Maddie worked with who diagnosed her with a faux condition, Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) to conceal the adverse event, according to Open Payments (a required database for pharmaceutical payments to physicians), from 2015-2021, had received $652,650.65 for associated research funding (with the amount increasing year by year).
•FND is an extremely disingenuous disease that is frequently used to gaslight patients who have received severe neurological injuries. I wrote much more about it here, including how neurologists lack the insight to recognize what they are doing when they authoritatively throw this diagnosis around.
•The experience Maddie had at the hospital was awful, and to some extent surreal, but for length considerations, I cut it from the presentation. Amongst other things, Maddie became much worse after she was at the hospital (e.g., she lost her ability to walk), and believes it was due to her MRI. I periodically encounter people with complex issues who get much worse from MRIs (especially the COVID-19 vaccine injuries). I’ve seen a few explanations for this, and of those, the most likely (but not only) explanation is it being due to the MRI’s contrast agent. Gadolinium is quite toxic for some, but this toxicity is rarely considered in medicine.
•Maddie was very fortunate to have a parent who was a nurse. Similar situations are even worse for those who have no direct experience in health care.
•They also provided the information at the end of the episode for Maddie’s lifefunder.
Brianne’s story
Many of the key points that needed to be made are contained within the above clip (I put two different presentations together). The key points I had to edit out to shorten it were:
•Brianne was actively communicating with the National Institute of Health (NIH) as part of a study for treating COVID-19 neurological injuries, which were repeatedly delayed by the NIH for political reasons (but was eventually published). In that study, they eventually settled on using intravenous immunoglobulin to treat the injury (which interestingly, also sometimes helps HPV vaccine injuries, but is also an expensive treatment requiring a large donor pool, and thus has limits to its scalability). I wrote more about Brianne’s experience with the NIH and their study here.
•Brianne founded an organization dedicated to helping COVID-19 vaccine injury victims. According to their organization (this was in response to Maddie’s story):
In the longer version of the above presentation, she mentions she and three other individuals injured in the clinical trials (each detailed in this article) all had their injuries classified as something innocuous to conceal them (e.g., Maddie’s injury was functional abdominal pain, Olivia’s T-cell lymphoma was lymphadenopathy). If I find out who the other 3 participants were, I will update the article to include them.
Note: The reason I now post tweets with videos throughout these articles is because Substack only allows videos from a few platforms to be embedded in articles (this matters because most people understandably won’t click through to outside videos). Of those platforms, Twitter is the only one that does not censor or delete controversial videos (I thought Vimeo worked as well, but a month and a half ago Vimeo deleted my entire channel).
Olivia’s story
Olivia’s story is the video at the top of this article (presented in that way due to its length) and in the Rumble video below:
Although her story is very similar to the others, there are a few important takeaway points from Olivia’s story which may not be immediately apparent.
First, for a variety of reasons detailed here, it’s often difficult for doctors to recognize subtle medical injuries unless they have been specifically trained to look for them. Instead, doctors tend to rationalize all of them as being due to psychiatric issues. What is unique about Olivia’s situation is that because everything that happened to her was so unusual, and most importantly, could be directly observed visually (so you could not deny it was happening), outside doctors were actually willing to acknowledge her injuries. Despite that, this is how Moderna’s PI treated her (clipped from the above video):
Nonetheless, despite it being unambiguous that her injury was due to the vaccine, Moderna did not pay for her medical care as promised, and did not report her injury. Additionally, the clinical trial site director said she would only be able to acknowledge that the cancer Olivia had was linked to the vaccine if “more research emerged in the future linking it” even though this happened at the trial that was supposed to determine if this could happen (note: this example illustrates a common deficit in critical thinking that exists throughout my profession).
Although her shoulder injury is alarming (and like Maddie, the physical therapy Olivia was forced to go through to “address” it should never have been conducted), the cancer she has is much worse. Based on her history, there is a very strong case that it was linked to her vaccination, and had this been presented in Moderna’s trial report, would have had huge implications for the many patients now developing cancers who are told they cannot possibly be related to the vaccine, and thus these victims are denied the support they need.
Unnamed Moderna Trial Participant’s Story
A while back, I was requested to review 865 vaccine injuries that were submitted in a survey to assess the plausibility thatthe deaths described were due to the vaccine. One of the reports caught my eye since it represented a critical incident that was not reported within Moderna’s trial report (see page 40), so I reached out to the doctor (who will remain unnamed) who submitted the report and had good reason to be knowledgeable of this patient’s history.
According to the doctor, the gentleman who passed away was part of the clinical trial at Research Atlanta that was paid for by Moderna. He developed atrial fibrillation after the vaccine, and approximately 3 months after vaccination, he was hospitalized (but never vented or sent to the ICU) at Grady Memorial Hospital (which is very close to the CDC).
At the hospital, he received a CT scan, which revealed blood clots in his lungs. At the time, no one was aware that the vaccine could cause blood clots (both Moderna and the CDC had insisted that the vaccine was safe, and had not revealed it was associated with blood clots). The blood clots were then assessed to have been due to metastatic cancer, as there was no other explanation for them, despite the fact that a full cancer workup was conducted which could not detect any signs of cancer in the patient. The doctor I corresponded with (who I deemed competent to assess this question) is certain that the patient did not have metastatic cancer.
The patient was then assessed to be terminally ill, discharged to hospice, and then died in hospice care (which may have been partly due to respiratory difficulties resulting from the opioids he was given for hospice). As you might expect, the clinical trial contacts were notified of what happened to this patient, but they ignored the report.
Augusto’s Story
Augusto was another clinical trial participant who was abused by Pfizer. Fortunately, he was a lawyer and did everything he could to hold them accountable.
The only direct summary I have found of Augusto’s experience can be found within this (shortened) interview (an article was also written documenting his experience here):
Although Augusto had the same experience as everyone else (e.g., they tried to say his issues were due to psychological problems and his adverse event never ended up in Pfizer’s final clinical trial report), there were also some remarkable aspects of his case:
•His hospitalization was initially documented by a senior specialist as an adverse reaction to a coronavirus vaccine (although as the previous examples have shown, this did not ultimately change the course of things).
•In addition to the team erroneously reporting the hospitalization which Augusto had directly told them about, the PI who was supervising his case fabricated a medical record to claim Augusto had an anxiety disorder. His injury (a pericardial effusion suggestive of pericarditis) was attributed to COVID-19 (even though Augusto had a negative test) and anxiety (even though anxiety cannot to my knowledge cause a pericardial effusion).
•The PI who was supervising his clinical trial site was also the lead author of Pfizer’s New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) study. Augusto’s experience and the documentation he had to support the lead author's misconduct is most likely the strongest argument for NEJM retracting Pfizer’s pivotal vaccine study (note: in addition to the erroneous COVID-19 studies mentioned here, the NEJM also previously published Merck’s highly questionable HPV vaccine study).
•Augusto obtained the record of another participant who died from a heart attack at the same hospital to which he was admitted, but was not registered in the final Pfizer clinical trial report.
•Augusto formally complained to the Department of Justice about this clinical trial conduct, but the government decided to avoid addressing it, despite their conduct being unlawful.
Pfizer vs. Moderna
Although many things could be said about these cases (which I suspect also holds true for the other ones I am not yet familiar with), one of the things that stands out to me from these reports is the differences in how Pfizer and Moderna conducted their trials.
In Pfizer’s case, they had a robust apparatus in place to have a team of physicians immediately neutralize any claims that the vaccine could be harmful. However, in Moderna’s case, they just told the doctors involved that the events could not be related to the vaccine and most doctors took those claims at face value (as they did not want to believe the vaccine could be harmful). Moderna, in effect, succeeded through inaction (by not documenting injuries or paying compensation for medical care they were obligated to).
I suspect this difference in strategies was due to Moderna being a fledging pharmaceutical company without an apparatus like the one Pfizer had developed over decades. Fortunately for Moderna, their laid-back approach ended up working out just as well since the FDA just rubber-stamped both of their vaccines.
Regardless of the approach that was followed though, I hope this examination into their mutual research misconduct helps to explain how these “impossible to predict” side effects that were never detected in the “robust” clinical trials could have suddenly emerged once the vaccines entered the market.
Conclusion:
Typically, it is nearly impossible to identify clinical trial participants and attempt to re-create what happened within a clinical trial. Due to the diligent work of leaders in this area like Del Bigtree, Aaron Siri, and a few clinical trial participants being brave enough to speak out publicly, we have been able to establish that serious adverse events occurred in all of the spike protein-producing vaccine trials.
More importantly, it should be apparent by now that the FDA has deliberately ignored this misconduct and tried to sweep the known adverse events under the rug. Based on all of this, I can state with near certainty there are other significant adverse reactions that did not make it to the final clinical trial reports.
Note: The fact that news stories like the above (the HPV vaccine trial malfeasance was the focus of the previous article) received mainstream coverage (e.g., ABC news) a mere decade ago goes to show just how rapidly the censorship of the media has increased in recent years. It also highlights how consequential failing to report the adverse events from a clinical trial can be for everyone injured after the fact.
Although exactly what degree of underreporting research fraud has occurred will probably never be known unless a legal investigation interviews each participant, as the examples in this article demonstrate, what is already known demonstrates that the vaccines are both ineffective and too dangerous to have on the market. On a more human level, what was done to these trial participants was appalling and needs to be prosecuted, and in the future may even happen if it becomes necessary to restore the public’s willingness to participate in the clinical trials which our medical system depends upon.
A major challenge of politics is catering a message to different political tribes, as each one will support certain messages and vehemently reject others. Most of the work we have done on the vaccine issue has been targeted to further convince those who already have doubts about the vaccines or sway those in the middle (which now represents a large portion of America). Very little work however has been directed to those who are already committed to the vaccines (since it is largely a lost cause to try to change their minds).
For a variety of reasons detailed in a recent article, I believe the message that has the best shot at reaching those already committed to the vaccines (and motivating congress and the courts to do something) is to prove that fraud was committed by the manufacturers. This is why I attempted to present some of the best evidence we have currently for that assertion here (that Pfizer did not report what is actually in their vaccines). An even more important part of proving that case is showing exactly what actually happened in the clinical trials.
My sincere hope is that this article will inspire others who participated in the trials to come forward, and it is something that can be cited when people (especially doctors) try to argue that the clinical trials proved that the vaccines were “safe.” I also faintly hope that awareness of this issue can inspire congressional hearings (which did happen previously with the disastrous anthrax vaccines that were forced on the military). Although I doubt it would ever happen, I believe that the best solution to all the issues outlined in this article is to give trial participants the legal right to sue pharmaceutical companies for compensation if the severe adverse reactions they experience are not included in the final trial report.
Because of the videos, this article was an enormous amount of work to put together. I sincerely believe these stories need to be heard, so if you take the time to listen to them and share the ones that speak to you with others, many would sincerely appreciate that.
Lastly, on a lighter note, one of the practices I occasionally do to calibrate my medical intuition is to guess which fortune cookie best fits each member of a group I am with and then see how accurate the pairings were once they are opened. Sometimes I also go a step further and guess what specific subject the future fortune will address. The one I got today tested as being directed at the readers of this article:
”A dose of adversity is often as needful as a dose of medicine.”
Fantastic work, as always. Nobody can accuse these folks of being anti-vaxxers, can they?
FYI I covered Augusto's story in a post after speaking with him. The post has links to more extensive write-up of his case with additional evidence on Dr. David Healy's blog:
https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/is-subject-12312982-the-key-to-proving
I first learned of Augusto's case through your write up!
Who in the Hell puts their kid in a Big Phrauda drug trial!?? Blows my mind!
I can't find it now, but there is an article on pressure to be a good person and volunteer for these trials back around 2020. It is even shown in the little ad where children are heroes. I beleive it is the same mindset that took the jab so granny wouldn't get sick.
Often the assumption is the drugs were previously tested so they won't be that bad. And these were, after all, "vaccines" so who hasn't taken one, there shouldn't be any big problem. Of course, no one told them this is a different "vaccine," not what you got before. I suspect few if any nowadays will want to test experimental drugs unless that is their last potential chance to live.
I pray the silver lining in the whole Plandemic fraud is the END of Any belief in these Dirty drug pushers!
Agreed, and they must be destroyed once and for all.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
Thank You and I will have a look
NO CHANCE!!! In Australia “they” are still advertising and pushing us to get our next “booster”!!! It beggars belief that we still have to be vaccinated with C19 jab if we need a transplant. Some jobs it is still a prerequisite that you must be jabbed? That is the ignorance of our medical fraternity on full display!
I included the ad (although this one was after the trials completed)! Were you able to read the previous one on the HPV vaccines?
I’ve probably earned the equivalent of a PHD by now considering how many rabbit holes I’ve gone down in trying to understand the Absolute Insanity of ALL the destruction that’s been orchestrated not only with The Covid crap but HPV, HIV, Oxy epidemic…..it goes on and on! I just recently listened to a young man on Joe Rogan speak of his experience working for Big Pharma! What he explained about the Gigantic part Big Insurance plays in All this Evil I hadn’t heard about before! It was quite an eye opener! I would love to see more light shed on those Bastards and their roll in the “attempted “ take down of this country!
Thank you Doc for all the great info you bring to the world!
POLIO, and "Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson. This is not a new event.
The interview I mentioned was with a man named Brigham Buhle! It was rather lengthy but very well worth a listen!
No, but I saw them on TV and remember them well, thinking should I get one, except it turns out I was too old. (Whew)
The truth is this has been going on for decades. For example the army has been used as guinea pigs and thousands harmed. This is unadulterated evil and must stop. and the perpetrators bought to justice.
Yes I know it has! My prayer is that their hoax has backfired in that this knowledge is being brought to more and more people and with that hopefully allow for the tide to turn! Taking a deep dive into how absolutely Evil The Government of our Beloved country is shocking and a lot to process!
The hoax has backfired in one sense and yet deliberately so in another way. It is a combination of Satan having a cunning plan to take over the world once and for all with his dark angels and God the heavenly Father and all the faithful light angels saying 'ya, boo, sucks! and turning it to good as always.
The hoax was too big and bound to fail as it were, so Covid 19 came to deal with the terminally dim and redeem the faithful once and for all.
There is still a way to go and as ever we must continue fighting until it all all quite completely done and dusted.
I think of this
Then Elisha said, “Take the arrows!” So he took them, and Elisha said to the king of Israel, “Strike the ground!” So he struck the ground three times and stopped. But the man of God was angry with him and said, “You should have struck the ground five or six times. Then you would have struck down Aram until you had put an end to it. But now you will strike down Aram only three times.”
I will strike the ground for ever if necessary, not just 5 or 6 times!
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/01/06/2022-a-review/
Another commenter recommended this Dr to me, and I found this interview with him. It is long, but I could not stop watching it. If you haven't seen it, you will find it worthwhile and even though you are aware of all this, as was I, it adds yet another layer to the evil and corruption, and the history of it for covid goes way, way back: https://www.ourfreedomtube.com/watch/2021-jul-09-fauci-pharma-rico-usa-manufactured-illusion-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich_sn6gucPS1RehyXm.html
I sent the link to one of the few politicians who has been looking into this plandemic and severely attacked for it. I hope he acts on it. Despite my lack of faith in much of government, there are still a few brave souls seeking truth. IMHO we need to encourage them as they have the ability to reach many people, whereas most of us do not.
Thank you very much, it is very long! It is a pity there aren't summary headings and times so that one can pick up the gist.
There is a phrase "Cast your bread upon the waters; after many days it will return to you."
Cast the truth where you will and those who attack you will be guilty and will bow to you in due course.
P.S. I have now skimmed through. The bit I pick up particularly is the patent issue near the end, the EU and Germany at about 1:19:30. As you say adds another layer or piece in the puzzle where I have understood the whole, but not the details which is what we are all here for, so thank you again.
I listened to it in stages, marking the time where I was last. I recommend actually hearing the whole thing, if you can. I prefer reading to videos as they do tend to be over long, so I usually skip them.
Same here. I have referenced the link for future use, analysis. I struggle at the moment as my energy is still not that good due to various issues but improving nevertheless. As the world wakes up I get better and vice versa.
I hope and will pray you (and everyone) get better.
Thank you very much. Here's a little good news: I spoke to a man and a woman, both late 60's plus, at the spa my wife and I attend. I spoke to him about my palsy and my issues and he talked a bit about his Parkinson's disease. We discussed vit D (he has never been tested!) and wasn't supplementing.
The lady piped up and said she was boosting her vit D. Then she said she had Covid after Xmas but had been ill for a week in bed. They both said they had been vaccinated of course.
I said please don't take the vaccines. I think at least a seed is planted and others may water if I don't.
"take the jab so that granny wouldn't get sick" is short for "innocent until proven guilty." And clearly pharma was not willing to be guilty, so they labeled their trials successful and beneficial. There's the fraud. We've been had by the very govt. our taxes support and which we've been told to trust.
PHARMA guilty!?!?!? I steer away from ALL. Haven’t had a prescription since 1992, and threw it away. This word PHARMA is Greek for POISON! Look it up.
The NFL **cannot** allow testing of Hamlin, or others for heart damage. Why?
a.) If a players heart is bad, out goes a zillion dollars in lifetime player earnings
b.) If the shots are bad, the NFL will get sued a gazillion dollars for forcing their players to get it.
Expect more lies, gaslighting and the usual "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain" schtick
The question of the century. And now we have parents injecting their 6 month olds EVEN after all the data out there, including the most widely available of all: the damn things don't even work! What parent after nearly 2 years, being able to see kids aren't affected, would put this in their child? It's mind boggling.
If their pediatricians recommend it? If the jabs are on the childhood vaccine schedule, it is probably done without the parents even thinking about it. People here follow this stuff closely, but most people don't and might not even be aware of the implications of the schedule.
My point was you had to live on another planet to not know they don't work, or that kids were at risk at all. That's if you literally do no research but just look around you. And they were getting jabbed long before the FDA and CDC put them on the schedule (BTW, that won't last)
I understood your point. I agree with it. Not everyone is as observant as you or others here. In fact, some of them are actually below average---that's how you get an average.
So, the internet means nada. However, below are SOURCE REFERENCES from the original studies, so you can verify (leave the fake news to CNN, MSNBC, Morning Joe -kster), CBC in Canada, PBS ad nauseam.
Dr. Makary at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Medicine with other scientists teamed up with the non-profit FAIR Health group to look at the insurance data of 48,000 children diagnosed with Covid between April 2020 and Aug. 2020. Not ONE of the children who died were free of pre-existing medical conditions such as cancer https://www.naturalhealth365.com/zero-covid-death-among-children-3920.html and here https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/06/covid-jabs-could-potentially-kill-thousands-of-kids-former-hhs-epidemiologist/ .
And this is true in Germany, too, where a massive study late fall showed ZERO – there’s that word again – deaths from Covid among healthy German kids, as reported by Alex Berenson here, Dec. 2, 2021, https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/huge-new-study-shows-zero-covid-deaths . Or see a the details in a late 2021 German study https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.30.21267048v1.full.pdf (collating evidence from three sources 1) a national seroprevalence study (the SARSCoV-2 KIDS study), 2) the German statutory notification system and 3) a nationwide registry on children and adolescents hospitalized with either SARS-CoV-2 or Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS-TS)) reported that there were zero (0) deaths in children 5 to 18 years old across the period of study. Ditto in Sweden - Swedish data by Ludvigsson https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33406327/ reported on the 1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2020) who were 1 to 16 years of age who attended school with largely no lockdowns or masks. They found zero (0) deaths. “Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.” If you include kids with serious morbidities, there were six deaths.
In Germany, out of a total population of 80 million, around 10 million school age kids. Even serious illness was extremely rare, 1 in 50,000. See Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s SWEDEN AND GERMANY: NO DEATHS IN CHILDREN DUE TO COVID https://brownstone.org/articles/sweden-and-germany-no-deaths-in-children-due-to-covid/ for more reading, or this article which notes that German scientists found that no healthy child 5-17 years of age died of COVID in Germany https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/autopsy-study-ties-deaths-to-covid-vaccine/
So, the internet means nada. However, below are SOURCE REFERENCES from the original studies, so you can verify (leave the fake news to CNN, MSNBC, Morning Joe -kster), CBC in Canada, PBS ad nauseam.
Dr. Makary at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Medicine with other scientists teamed up with the non-profit FAIR Health group to look at the insurance data of 48,000 children diagnosed with Covid between April 2020 and Aug. 2020. Not ONE of the children who died were free of pre-existing medical conditions such as cancer https://www.naturalhealth365.com/zero-covid-death-among-children-3920.html and here https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/06/covid-jabs-could-potentially-kill-thousands-of-kids-former-hhs-epidemiologist/ .
And this is true in Germany, too, where a massive study late fall showed ZERO – there’s that word again – deaths from Covid among healthy German kids, as reported by Alex Berenson here, Dec. 2, 2021, https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/huge-new-study-shows-zero-covid-deaths . Or see a the details in a late 2021 German study https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.30.21267048v1.full.pdf (collating evidence from three sources 1) a national seroprevalence study (the SARSCoV-2 KIDS study), 2) the German statutory notification system and 3) a nationwide registry on children and adolescents hospitalized with either SARS-CoV-2 or Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS-TS)) reported that there were zero (0) deaths in children 5 to 18 years old across the period of study. Ditto in Sweden - Swedish data by Ludvigsson https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33406327/ reported on the 1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2020) who were 1 to 16 years of age who attended school with largely no lockdowns or masks. They found zero (0) deaths. “Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.” If you include kids with serious morbidities, there were six deaths.
In Germany, out of a total population of 80 million, around 10 million school age kids. Even serious illness was extremely rare, 1 in 50,000. See Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s SWEDEN AND GERMANY: NO DEATHS IN CHILDREN DUE TO COVID https://brownstone.org/articles/sweden-and-germany-no-deaths-in-children-due-to-covid/ for more reading, or this article which notes that German scientists found that no healthy child 5-17 years of age died of COVID in Germany https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/autopsy-study-ties-deaths-to-covid-vaccine/
Excellent compilation.
Thanks. Key thing is to verify (leave the fake news with PBS, CNN, NYT) then pass on to others. There's more of us than them, and if we can just wake people up, we will win....
It's criminal.
Which is putting in mildly. Satanic I prefer, snake oil/poison.
They aren’t looking. Many parents are very young coming out of a school system that indoctrinates them into believing vaccines are necessary and they had theirs and they think they are fine. So any vaccine that a doctor wants to give their child, they go along with. There have probably been they knew affected by a vax along the way… but many who are affected, they themselves don’t know… ie., the rashes and asthma connected with vaccines is NEVER acknowledged by the docs treating these conditions and the parents or victims have no idea that there’s a connection and even if they questioned and asked for testing, the docs and the insurance won’t have anything to do with it … but the parents just haven’t been cued in and refuse to look even when they are cued in. Prior to 2020, the vast majority of ‘anti vaxxers’ consisted of parents w vax injury who were simply speaking out about their experience and poor treatment by the medical personnel and a handful of docs who were cued in and were exposing, essentially, the fraudulent nature, of the vax program after having looked for the ‘science’, the evidence surrounding vax. And to their surprise, ultimately lost their careers in many cases.
The Journal of the American Heart Association Research, in Occurrence and Features of Childhood Myocarditis: A Nationwide Study in Finland published in 2017, here, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005306 stated the background rate of myocarditis in youth, was four cases per million per year. Assuming 60 million American children, the background rate for myocarditis would be 240 cases a year. So how many cases of myocarditis have been reported to VAERS following COVID injection so far? 16,918 as of December 3, 2021. https://openvaers.com/covid-data And of course, it’s increasing several hundred to a couple of thousand every week.
“Doctors have never seen so many cases of myocarditis," Peter McCullough says. "It is frequent, and it is severe. My fear is, some of these kids who develop myocarditis will be in the 13% category where they have progressive left ventricle dysfunction and heart failure.” According to McCullough, 86% of youth who develop myocarditis in response to the jab are sick enough to require hospitalization. In fact, per Defender, here https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/deaths-vaers-covid-shots-vaccination/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=05cdb832-6ac0-4222-a830-9d80794471ca 21% of deaths reported to VAERS after Covid shots occurred within 48 hours of getting shot. For further reading, here’s where McCullough discusses an “astronomical” rise in myocarditis from the shot – here looking at a national study in Finland, published in the Journal of the American Heart Association. Sitting next to him is the UK’s top doctor, Aseem Malhotra, who supported the shot… until he looked at the data. The background deaths per million is 4 before Covid; then it went to 62 cases per million, then a UC Davis study showed 250 cases per million…. Then a Kaiser Permannte study showed 527 cases per million… and as of early Jan. 2023, the Mansanguan et al study, along with one other study found 2,500 cases per million.
************That’s a 62,400% increase. ****************
Don't believe me. Here's the Mansanguan, et al study, Cardiovascular manifestation of the BTN16b2 mRNA Covid Vaccine in Adolescents https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006288/
Very legitimate question. That is what needs to be asked across the board.
Thought most drug trial participates are in need of Cash and are 18 and older.
This is a case where I would be happy to contribute to Give, Send Go for them or other politically neutral support group.
One of my friends put her teen twin daughters in the trial. She bragged about it on Facebook all proud of her daughters making such an important decision. She told her daughters they could keep the money if they chose to do it. They both received the vaccine in the trial. She worships science and still wears a mask.
I hope her kids will be OK.
It's easy to say that from your position. I wouldn't do it either. But we know that "big phrauda" :-) are criminal gangsters.
Many (most?) people still (even today) believe that big phrauda is in the business of offering safe, life saving treatments and that participating in a trial is just a way to help mankind and get the safe and effective treatment before it's generally available.
It's all a question of the information available to people.
Maybe they thought what they were doing was for the greater good?
You have to remember the intense military and government psyops that told us we were going to die. We would kill grandma.
I try not to be too harsh - although I disagree with children being involved.
It seems many are missing my point. The approval for children 6 months to 5 years old, was way later than any issues you mention. It was nearly 2 years into the jabs and over 2 years into the data showing children were not at risk. Moreover, it was over a year after everyone knew that jabbed people were getting covid anyway. The timing for these small children is very relevant to my original point.
They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions, although the word hell actually means 'light' or 'fair' so misplaced. So unwittingly perhaps they did it for the greater god, the god of this world who is as evil as they come.
Bizarre perhaps but 'greater good' is an anagram of 'ego garroted'. Fitting under the circumstances.
In fact ego comes up frequently in the anagram phrases. People have put their ego before God Most High and paid the price for not double checking first. Very sad.
The psyops we're totally against any 7th grade science class. So in this country most people went up to 9th or 10 the grade.Were those who believed the psyops, actually in class?
What crappy country do you live in?
Probably same Country as you.
Why are they still going along w the excessive vaccine program.
Thank you for writing this article. It is most valuable. I shall share this with as many friends as I can.
I think most people assume that science research is always done in a very "clean" and ethical manner. The truth is unfortunately quite often the opposite. Personally I know of 4 friends or relatives who worked as researchers or research assistants in the science / biomedical field. Of the 4, 3 of them left a position at one time due to the fraud they encountered being beyond what they could abide by.
I do not know how others will take your fortune cookie anecdote, but I really liked it.
The intellect is useful tool but is not everything and sometimes, it somehow simply fails us.
It certainly seems to have failed a lot of mainstream doctors.
Intuition is a most valuable skill to master. Empathy and Love more so.
I really enjoy reading your articles. They are so interesting and thought provoking. Please continue.
Thank you :)
I love your username too!
🗨 The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honours the servant and has forgotten the gift.
↑↑ What took a genius to perceive a century back, is increasingly evident to many an ordinary citizen of our ailing planet 🤷
I doubt if anyone can prove whether someone's thought is intuition or impression. I learned early not to trust impressions. They're wrong at least as often as they're right.
Your 2nd to last line hits the nail on the head!!
Masterpiece. I would argue that the column be renamed to garner the attention it deserves, something like: "How Trends in Clinical Research Fraud are reflected in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials/ Studies."
I like the book "Turtles all the Way Down," for how it reveals many of the common tricks for soft fraud--which litter the landscape of ALL of the childhood schedule vaccines, but the effort you put into this piece clearly shows. Your writing is eloquent, with moving examples, with the added plus of hearing, directly, the voices of people who were injured as a result.
Kudos all the way Up!
Thank you. I had to use a shorter subtitle because otherwise it was clipped in Twitter embeds (as the video part is at the start of the subtitle) but since that is locked in now, I changed the title.
God bless all the Hero Whistleblowers who have paid a great price to come forward to save lives.
You saved my life & my children & grandchildren from taking the evil Medical Cabal’s poisonous shots.
Unfortunately several family & friends would not listen & took the covid shots, I refuse to call it a vaccine because it is not!
We are watching in horror & agony as many of our friends, family & neighbors who took the Covid shots be injured, sick & died suddenly!
It has made most of us fearful of ever trusting our doctors & hospitals again!?!
I’m a cancer survivor & I called my doctor & was told their protocol & the hospitals protocol in my state & almost every state was to get jabbed & if you went to the hospital sick with Covid they would put you on Remdesivir & a ventilator if necessary & no other treatments were available!
Thank God for doctors like you who came forward early, I purchased Ivermectin early to have at home in case we got Covid.
So far we have not gotten sick but watch many vaccinated around us get sick with Covid over & over again!
God bless the Hero Whistleblowers❣️🙏🏼
We owe them a lot!
@ Sheila. But vaccines aren't vaccines either. They suppress immunity, instead of improving it.
It is a vaccine only much more poisonous than normal. All vaccines have been utterly pointlessness at best but cause harm and sometimes death.
I was misdiagnosed with cancer which was in fact sodium nitrite (E250) poisoning. It toxic effects have been known about for over 100 years yet still they put in it processed meats quite unnecessarily. The chemical leads to nitrosamines, a far more toxic product. This has been known about for around 40 years and the stupid oncologists etc. never once asked me about my diet.
These are my links on these matters if you are interested.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/
At this stage, the overwhelming majority of people in academia generally, and in such disciplines particularly, are not researchers, but rather crooks and impostors. The reason behind this is simple -- these people are what the selection process is skewed toward. It has been happening for a long time, and at this stage the mankind is reaping what it has been sowing for the past several decades
This is less of a problem in less competitive/elitist institutions, and I have been fortunate to have been at less prestigious smaller institutions which lacked many of these issues.
At prestigious places, there are two hidden "tiers" of the faculty. The first tier are those who are known for solving an important problem, or making an important discovery, or some other great contribution, and these were typically "poached" from wherever they worked at the time they made their accomplishment. The second tier are those who are kept around for their "ability" to acquire funding, and these usually rise from a junior position through promotion ranks at the place itself. At the current stage, the latter vastly outnumber the former, which has become a problem
My cousin Kim Holland is complicit. She loves her job as a drug rep at Merck. Forbid her daughters from taking the Gardasil jab. Won’t discuss it.
I know of one case where a Pfizer sales rep who aggressively pushed all vaccines possible (and bragged about giving his daughter Gardasil) showed up to my friend's clinic begging for a medical exemption to this vaccine.
She is merely a product of the current selection process, which favors zero integrity. It will change once everything is destroyed
I don’t know how she sleeps at night, guess she sold her soul for financial prosperity.
Her conscience has been seared… 🔥🔥🔥
My only sibling has sold out completely too, vice president of an insurance company in Cooperstown New York.
Sorry to hear that. She is guilty of grievous bodily harm at least. I suppose she loves the money.
The Sacklers are a very, very evil family. They should be destroyed for what they did to thousands of people.
Thanks. Will check it out. My dad had a botched back surgery, he trusted the doctors. He was on fentanyl during the crisis and suddenly he had to get off the pain killers and take suboxone , it was very cruel. I’m glad he wasn’t around to witness what’s going on now.
Methadone and suboxone are both neuro-toxic. It is the nitrogen in the chemistry every time. One just has to look up the substance and the diagram on Wikipedia for example. N for nitrogen.
They are pain relief: an anagram of nitrogen is 'int negro' so internal black, it brings the night as it were, but leads to permanent night and thus death.
Most big pharma drugs are neuro-toxic and pointless, they are over refined and toxic and addictive to many.
My dad’s first back surgeon went to prison briefly, upstate New York. Later he simply moved to New Jersey and set up practice again. His nurse was writing prescription for pain medicine and wasn’t a citizen so she sang like a bird to cover herself.
💌
The commercial with the Superhero kids was perhaps the most heartbreaking of all, especially immediately preceding the video of Superhero Maddie deGaray.
Thank you for taking the time and care to assemble this article. Yet another labor of love for humanity.
Yeah. This one was a lot of work but I felt I had a duty to do it correctly.
You did your duty and then some! Great work and many thanks.
I found the commercial sickening, exploitation of the innocent.
"I tried to research it [HPV vaccine] but nothing could be found." This really resonated with me as I had been struggling with whether or not to vaccinate my first child in 2009. I loved our sweet pediatrician who convinced me the naysayers were nuts (there's always a handful of nuts out there right?), but I also did what I felt was a deep dive on the internet, among other things. I had no idea that back in 2012 Google was nothing less than the total amount of information known to man and completely uncensored. No wonder I couldn't find anything on the ills of vaccines other than strong articles debunking "anti-vaxxers." Absence of information in information too right? And so I vaccinated him.
This is how it works. A highly controlled, secretly-policed information patrol. I wish I had known then what I know now. Hopefully this Covid event shed a light on this for millions as it did for me.
"I wish I had known then what I know now". I can't tell you how many times over my lifetime I've said that exact phrase. Unfortunately, our learning curve tends to peak around mid-life. That's when we really open our eyes and recognize that we've been hood-winked. At least you recognized it, as most do not! Thanks for your input. You and I both vaccinated our children with questionable products. Now we both have to live with that knowledge.
Too true. You say "I loved our sweet pediatrician". The problem is outward appearances. I have seen very sweet female doctors in my local surgery, but they were of no use in diagnosing my facial palsy.
In the end I was misdiagnosed with cancer which I only discovered when after pointless and harmful immuno-therapy with it turns out similar ingredients to the vaccines that I had sodium nitrite poisoning. This was no thanks to the NHS.
The worst of it is that the issues with sodium nitrite ave been known about for over 100 years And not one doctor or anybody in the NHS asked me about what I ate. Despicable!
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/
Judicial Watch sued because of Gardasil.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/govt-still-pushing-hpv-vaccine-kids-decade-jw-exposed-deadly-side-effects/
Oh I forgot to put that in the first part!
“Heart's wave could not curl and break beautifully into the foam of spirit, unless the ageless silent rock of destiny stood in its path.”
― Hölderlin
a line from the Amores by the Roman poet Ovid, "Perfer et obdura, dolor hic tibi proderit olim. (Be patient and tough; someday this pain will be useful to you.)"
”A dose of adversity is often as needful as a dose of medicine.”
Hard work and long days build strong bodies and minds. The human body is a masterpiece, and it's built for adversity, as it grows from it. Sheltering the body from every element robs it of the fullness of life.
For that very reason, 2/3 of the USA population was cowed into yearning, or simply accepting, that the toxin billed as a vaccine would protect them. Pioneers did discover that therapeutics had efficacy; pioneers did discover that the clinical disease was not ARDS. Pirates shut them all down.
How did civilization long ago view and deal with pirates and piracy? There were some things you just didn't do, even if you were on the other side of the planet in a vast ocean, for civil society somehow caught up to you. Today, the pirates run it all. Why? Because, civil society believes the law will administer medicine and cure the ailments. Forgotten is that the law was instituted by those who suffered through adversity.
I don't know where this originated...but it keeps coming back to me.
“Hard times create strong men.
Strong men create good times.
Good times create weak men.
And weak men create hard times.”
Great comment!
The body's exterior is close to a masterpiece, but the interior is mostly disgusting, except at the microscopic level. I don't identify with my blood and guts and junk like that.
We are fearfully and wonderfully made both inside and out. Mind you, with all the junk food people eat I daresay the inside is not so great now.
You must remember that most of the body functions are automated otherwise you would have be consciously telling your heart and lungs to keep working. So I wouldn't call it disgusting, it might seek revenge on you, Montezuma or otherwise!
Do you have a reference for that?
I recommend checking-out Dr. Joseph Mercola's in-depth analysis article on fluoride in public utilities water systems. If you go to mercola.com, you can search for this topic in the archives of his articles on his website.
I know fluoride affects the endocrine system.
Are you sure? I thought they'd lowered the recommendation from 1ppm to 0.7ppm.
Fluoride is still toxic and quite unnecessary just like vaccines. Ozone should be used but of course it is more expensive and anyway bi pharma need somewhere to dump their hazardous wast.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/11/04/fluoridation-uk-alert/
The key to understanding the toxicity of compound sis the ending in this case -ide, such as found in suic-ide, patric-ide and matric-ide.
-ide is an anagram of die. Thus it kills of course.
An anagram of fluoride is 'dire foul'. A warning to the wise.
Chlorine persists longer in water distribution systems, so can get things like giardia cysts ozone can't. Generally better, however. Fluoride is more commonly a waste product of phosphate fertilizer production. "ide" just means negative charge with no external oxygen present, such as oxide (water), chloride, and iodide. Not all, such as cyanide, are quite so safe. I can't think of any anions ending in "cide".
Thank you for the information. The -ide's still kill things. Beware the Ides of March, it meant death for Julius Caesar!
My guess is the reason for engaging in "soft" fraud vs. "hard" fraud is because hard fraud is far easier to spot, and impossible to deny.
Soft fraud is obfuscatory, requiring work to uncover, can be dismissed as error, can be exacerbated by delaying tactics, etc. I personally think it should be dealt with just as harshly (if not more harshly) than hard fraud.
Yep. They always want to leave room for plausible deniability. We are living in a world where common definitions are being changed, contradictory narratives from scientists and medical experts are censored, personal stories of vaccine injury are censored and rampant institutional corruption/hyper-politicization of agencies, etc, are the new normal. If they actually cared about the public and wanted to keep us "safe," like they said they do, these vaccines would have been pulled from the market a long time ago. It very much appears like we are the targets.
"It very much appears like we are the targets."
Always have been.
We are incidental. The target is $$$$$$$$$$.
It's both. They don't want to pay pensions for the "useless olds".
At one time that was certainly a prime motivator and still is for the under-tiers of these systems, but those at the very top who make these things happen already own everything. I don't believe money motivates them at all any longer, except insofar as it manipulates those "beneath" them.
Exactly. They have a cadre of psychopaths that do their bidding... As long as they get paid, and as long as they think they're safe. They'll be getting less of both.
Well, there is the game of who has the most toys. As far as I know, it is still played.
That is also very possible.
Agreed 100%.
Heartbreaking story of Moderna trial participant.
This has been happening in clinical trials for long time. Trials are about getting product on the market. The antidepressants trials were riddled with miscoding of suicidal ideation as emotional lability. There were games played with the calculations to show marginal benefit over product. Much of the Paxil and Zoloft clinical trial fraud came out in litigation after suicide deaths and millions and millions taking “safe and effective” products.
Unfortunately these jab manufacturers were given complete legal immunity. This was a huge red flag for me from beginning.
Thanks for your important post.
Interestingly the main negative piece of feedback this series has received was on criticizing the antidepressant trials.
This was another hard read. 💔
Giving trial participants the legal right to sue pharmaceutical companies for compensation if the severe adverse reactions they experience are not included in the final trial report seems a minimal expectation in a humane society. How devastating that it seems like an unrealistic goal.
My favorite fortune cookie message ever: beware of cookies bearing fortunes! 🥠
:)
i told my gf over and over again, not to take this shot... well, she didn't listen, she even got the first booster... i know she did it because she couldn't stand up to the the abusive social ostracism propaganda campaign that was organized and sponsored by big pharma, elected gov, and admin gov... i think maybe very many felt obliged or intimidated to take the vax... some were forced to do it to maintain a paycheck... this was a conspiracy from the beginning... now that death rates are skyrocketing, she's getting very nervous... if she's lucky, she only got saline or an inert batch both times... time will tell
i hope hundreds, if not thousands are hanged for committing this evil
Go to howbadismybatch.com and look up the number of adverse events associated with the lot numbers she took.
👀 💉💔 Conspiracy diagnosis - a short parody video filled with coincidental sound and fury ... (2 minutes)
In case you need a wry laugh today, this medical diagnosis commercial for [the actually fake medical group] Kaufman Institute for Coincidence is BRILLIANT: https://youtu.be/hZZFnNwdgqQ
Transcript from the YouTube video:
________________________________
[Music]
Are you or a loved one suffering from a medical coincidence?
You want proper medical care, but you don't want people sniffing around asking a whole bunch of questions about what might be causing your problem?
At the Kauffman Institute for Coincidence, we won't look into the cause of your heart or other problem.
We'll just fix it!
That's right.
We promise to only look at your symptoms.
We won't get all curious looking for causes because that could get your employer or your doctor into some legal hot water.
And nobody wants that!
At Kaufman, we understand that coincidence is now the leading cause of death.
[Music]
Operate at the speed of science!
There's no time for looking for causes, no pesky questions about drugs or vaccines you may have been given.
At Kaufman, we specialize in the effects and leave the causes to the conspiracy theorists.
And let's be honest: we know the cause anyway.
It was a coincidence, right?
For each new patient, Kaufman's talented team of doctors strap on their blinders and look directly at the problem area, usually the heart just like the CDC
recommends.
Our main campus now treats myocarditis, blood clots, heart arrhythmia, stroke, heart attack, magnetic skin, difficulty breathing, full body blisters and burning, convulsions, kidney failure, memory loss, cancer, sudden death, and much much more.
Give your coincidence the attention it deserves -- but not the wrong kind of attention -- at Kaufman.
Schedule your appointment today at KauffmanCoincidence.com and receive a doctor's note with a real sciency sounding explanation to provide to your anti-vaxx friends, proving to them it was definitely not the vaccine that caused your coincidence.
Kaufman...
Because coincidence has happened pretty much all the time.
Official medical coincidence partner of the NFL.
________________________________
For more parodies like this, check out https://www.youtube.com/@iwantlibertees
Note: KauffmanCoincidence.com is not a real website. Darn! (But it is available as of 1/17/2023).
I just got this in my news feed about how HPV has gone down in North America. Let's herald the HPV Vaccine!!! (Not) Unbelievable how Pharma controls the narrative: https://globalnews.ca/news/9414113/cervical-cancer-canada-us-dropping-hpv-vaccine-experts/
A lot of datasets show the opposite.
Yes, the datasets show the opposite, yet the MSM narrative heralds the HPV vaccine (great advertisement!). I personally know of only one woman, 60 years-old, who was diagnosed with cervical cancer -- all my life! Well, it was a "pre-cancer". Anyway, she had the surgery, no chemo, and developed lymphedema 5 years ago post-surgery which has never resolved to this day. Other than that, I've never known any woman to have cervical cancer -- and my career is in a sector where I am in personal contact with about 500 clients/year and in such a personal nature that they also talk about their families and friends. So, that's like 5,000 people if everyone has 10 close friends/family.
"Experts think they know why". This sort of phrase is always used. Disgusting. They only 'think', they don't know but in reality they are liars and frauds and will pay dearly for this.
Yes, and who exactly are the "experts" being quoted? Are they public health experts? The same ones that know nothing about microbiology, immunology, vaccinology or epidemiology? Are those the so-called "experts"?
Here are some good articles regarding Pfizer and trials
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/11/british-medical-journal-researcher-blows-the-whistle-on-data-integrity-issues-in-pfizers-vaccine-trial.html
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/08/sloppy-pfizer-booster-clinical-trial-consent-form-provides-way-to-exclude-reactions-that-require-emergency-care.html
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2020/12/an-internal-medicine-doctor-and-his-peers-read-the-pfizer-vaccine-study-and-see-red-flags.html
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2020/12/a-document-maven-looks-at-the-pfizer-vaccine-paper-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine.html
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2020/12/covid-the-politicization-of-science-and-more-questions-about-the-pfizer-vaccine-approval.html
"The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it." - Joseph Mengele.
[Fixed a typo]
Are you a compulsive jab user?
Dial 1-800-4PFIZER today.
And now we have this:
https://www.9news.com.au/national/queensland-vaccine-trial-three-in-one-covid19-rsv-influenza/a7a5ee57-4d91-4060-b869-13bcf10d9b9a
First thought was I bet that is a mRNA vaccine by Pfizer or Moderna....yup it is.
They are going to use the fact that these things were proven to be safe to push more and more through.
Exactly. But what about the possibility of this creating a new super bug mutation that will spread from the trial cities? Is that a thing?
No, because the whole thing is a ghastly fraud and has been since Edward Jenner. All the super-bug nonsense was to strike the fear of god into people to make them try the latest vaccine or drug as otherwise the 'Alien monster bug' will kill us all.
The only super bugs are they super chemical poisons that big pharma use on us to dispose of their toxic waste at a huge profit.
It is the world's biggest scam along with big pharma drugs in general which are largely neuro-toxic and pointlessness at best.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/12/02/various-variants-covid-19/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
“A dose of adversity is often as needful as a dose of medicine”
Yes, include it.
Romans 8:28 is the scripture that calms my aching heart and soul. I have experienced the fulfillment of God’s promise in my life so very many times.
Thank you
Some more info on the Pfizer trials:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/here-are-the-2-pfizer-documents-the
Look at how many reports they had and it is only in the 2 months or so after the mass jabbings started:
This document provides an integrated analysis of the cumulative post-authorization safety data, including U.S. and foreign post-authorization adverse event reports received through 28 February 2021.
the System Organ Classes (SOCs) that contained the greatest number (≥2%) of events, in the overall dataset, were General disorders and administration site conditions (51,335 AEs), Nervous system disorders (25,957), Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (17,283), Gastrointestinal disorders (14,096), Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (8,476), Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (8,848), Infections and infestations (4,610), Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (5,590), and Investigations (3,693).
Case outcome:
Fatal 1223
Unknown 9400
You said: "I ascribe to the belief that many useful medical interventions have a large enough magnitude of effect...."
I think "subscribe" should replace "ascribe".
I mostly agree that "the value of (perfect) RCTs is heavily over-emphasized", EXCEPT in the case of vaccines, since the "healthy vaccine user bias" is very real https://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/center-for-drug-safety-and-effectiveness/training/seminar-series/Sumit_Majumdar.pdf, which makes it very easy to pretend that even an extremely dangerous vaccine saves lives. Of course, RCTs are especially needed for experimental vaccines in order to assess safety, especially long-term safety months and years later. So what did the RCTs for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines show?
4 killed for every 3 saved, that is, 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths overall (compared to the placebo groups), even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-2021. The separate Pfizer and Moderna trials both showed a 15-17% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo. Importantly, these excess deaths with vaccination showed up ONLY by the 6-month follow-up. At the 1-month follow-up there were no excess deaths in either trial, clearly indicating delayed deaths.
Pfizer: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf – Table S4
Moderna: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf – Table S26
”A dose of adversity is often as needful as a dose of medicine.”
Fear Inoculum, by Tool:
https://youtu.be/8F34HLP3bHk
I heard he died . . .
Well I remember this commercial. Pfizer on youtube
"Thank You! 5-11 Year Old Covid19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Volunteers"
I have to take issue with the treatment of Prozac and SSRIs in general in this article. Im an MD. I have a biochem degree. I have a close family member who is a psychiatrist. My father who passed of natural causes in 2019 at 85 suffered from bipolar depression on and off his entire life. My only (younger male) sibling committed suicide in 2011. I remember the year prozac was approved. My father took it and it was a life changing thing for him. Patients who are severely depressed and suicidal and who have psychomotor retardation and fatigue and massive paralyzing anxiety would find sometimes when they started prozac that they would see a relief in the psychomotor retardation BEFORE the mood improving effects of prozac kicked in. This increase in energy allowed some of these people to act out on their suicidal impulses. Prozac was said to be causing suicidal ideation. But thats not really true. Prozac was originally reserved for the most depressed worst cases; the people for whom electroshock and lithium didnt work. The prozac was jn some cases potentiating or facilitating the suicidal ideation. To say that this drug shouldnt have been approved or that it is dangerous is irresponsible ignorant and disingenuous. When patients were monitored closely as inpatients and given prozac , after 4-6 weeks most of them had significant improvements in mood and decreases in suicidal ideation. I dont disagree that ssri’s are way over prescribed and are used inappropriately in huge numbers of patients. But saying that SSRIs cause suicidality is not correct. Saying this is sloppy and incomplete reporting that really discredits the rest of the article.
You might want to research that topic more (I provided the references for it in the two articles I wrote on the subject).
I have and followed it for years. I dont think its right to uniformly condemn this class of drugs for this reason. They have indications. Some prople are helped by them . Ssris treat major depressive episodes with anxious features very well . They are certainly overprescribed and used too long . But outright condemning them is extreme
My argument essentially is:
•Some people benefit from SSRIs, but they comprise a minority of those who receive them, and there are for all practical purposes no guidelines to identify these people.
SSRIs on average cause more harm than benefit.
•I have friends who believe SSRIs helped them, but I have more friends who strongly believed they harmed them. Given that the entire outcome of the drugs should be based on your psychological well being, this is highly significant.
•If you look at what happened during the approval process, all of the drug regulators did not want to approve Prozac because of how bad the data was, and an executive had to make bribes to overcome this issue (which he later testified to doing). Similarly, the FDA (despite their incredibly lax standards) would not approve the drug, until Bush overrode the FDA.
If you are making an argument for no government involvement in medical care, drug development and approval, medical insurance and scientific research, I completely agree. If you are claiming that the FDA is corrupt and inept, you will have no argument from me.
None of the federal US agencies up to the NIH have any constitutional legitimacy. If we are to have an FDA at all, it should be concerned only with assessing whether a particular agent is safe , and leave the determination of effectiveness up to the market.
My cousin the psychiatrist would agree with all you say. SSRIs are overused , abused and in many many cases cause more harm. Some of the newer ones, however are excellent at treating anxiety and the physical symptoms of depression like psychomotor retardation, and severe anxiety. Have you ever had a panic attack? Or a major depressive episode? Or a major depressive episode punctuated by anxiety attacks? I have. My dad did and tried to kill himself several times. My brother did and eventually hanged himself. These drugs helped us tremendously. I took paxil and lexapro twice in my life for about 6 months for a major depressive episode. I currently take no meds at all. I have no medical issues. I've never tried to commit suicide. At various times I took lithium.
If we had a free market im sure something like an SSRI would be available just like we would have vaccines available but we would have a much more transparent process and the safety and quality would be much better.
Have you ever seen Thomas dilorenzos work on the public health establishment?
From Pathology to Politics: Public Health in America, with James T. Bennett, (2000). Transaction Publishers, ISBN 0765800233. OCLC 43978653
https://www.amazon.com/Pathology-Politics-Public-Health-America-ebook/dp/B075CP2W9J
For a severely depressed person taking an SSRI, the relief of the crushing paralyzing dread and anxiety can be miraculous. But just like kids with gender dysphoria, the underlying personality and social or relationship issues causing the depression or mood problems are still there.
No, they have never "treated" or cured emotional problems. It's a sedative, or stimulant, and covers up underlying issues. Fix those without the drugs.
Absolutely!
Prozac contains nitrogen and fluorine. It is highly neuro-toxic. Most big pharma drugs are neuro-toxic and suppress symptoms but don't as other say deal with the real issues.
There are 2 aspects to mental issues, the psychological and the body. The body' chemistry is a vital part and has been severely messed up by big pharma drugs. They were never, ever needed.
Many people have benefitted from SSRIs. I used paxil for a while and it really helped me. My dad used prozac and And others and the effects were life-changing. You are correct that the drugs can improve the physical symptoms of depression, while not really improving the mental symptoms, but still they have a role.
I understand where you are coming from but there are natural herbs and spices that will do the same thing without the nasty side effects. Natural herbs and spices are designed so that they can be used as part of a balanced diet giving close control on the intake.
Big pharma take natural things, refine them/break them down into the one particular thing that is supposed to have the desired effect.
They then add bulking agent to sell to the gullible at a price to reflect them mucking about with something that was perfectly adequate in the first place!
It has always been about the money and not about health. The original products were cheap or free but big pharma does not like free as it does not suit its business model.
I’ve been on Prozac for 28 years. I was initially prescribed it for insomnia and it was very helpful at the time. However it destroyed my libido and, despite numerous attempts, I can’t get off it. This is despite starting tapering at the rate of minus 1 every two weeks At a certain point my mental health deteriorates to the point I have to abandon my attempt. It seems there is no safe exit strategy for this drug and the medical profession in general is in denial about this
Theres no question it destroys libido. for some thats a good thing. There are sex addicts out there who were also depressed and also substance abusers. SSRIs have helped them. The long term effects and inability to come off them are very serious.
Crossposting my comment from Dr. Malone’s cross post of this article in case useful (sorry if I’m cross posting too much!):
Soooo much fraud and deceit at CDC, FDA, VAERS, etc.
Check this out:
podcast 1 hr: Shocking VAERS Fraud – How The CDC Protects The Lie | Dr. Henry Ealy with Albert Benavides | Jan 9, 2023
This fraud illustrates just one reason why no one should ever be mandated to take any medical treatment and why WE MUST REPEAL every law exempting pharmaceutical companies and their administering agents from liability for injury or death. ‘
* https://www.americaoutloud.com/vaers-fraud-how-the-cdc-protects-the-lie/
Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSaware.com and expert data analyst exposes the extensive criminal fraud by the CDC and NVSS through the manipulation of VAERS data.
* https://www.vaersaware.com/
* https://rumble.com/user/welcometheeagle
Thank you!
I hope you appreciated the guest post being done
Yes, totally appreciated. I love when two of my doctor/heroes work together! Collaboration! What an awesome concept. Everyone wins when the good guys/gals work together to help each other reach more people.
Do you know about the infant (under 1 year old) in the Moderna trial for infants and young children who developed type I diabetes from the vaccine. Moderna acknowledged the vaccine link, but buried it in the supplemental appendix of their report. Somehow the case was ignored and the vaccine approved. I can did up the report if you don't have it.
Please do.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2209367/suppl_file/nejmoa2209367_appendix.pdf
63rd page of the document (labeled page 62 at the bottom) in the footnotes of table S26.
See el gato malo's description of it here:
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/moderna-trial-shows-type-1-diabetes
I actually had a teenage patient who developed type 1 diabetes immediately after Gardasil and I was the only doctor who believed the two were linked.
Hello AMD,
What's the long term prognosis for the asymptomatic vaccinees? Do you feel their bodies will be able to heal themselves and return to baseline health, like a smoker who stops at 30 years of age? Or will we be seeing lots of premature deaths and health problems like with the Chernobyl victims?
Imo this really depends on what was in the vial. I saw an interview with a person who analysed a large number of different charges from different manufacturers. He said, that there were large differences between the charges and that the quality of the stuff in the vials changed with time. Additionally, he analysed the blood of a German diplomat, who had been vaccinated by his employer 4 times (2 x Sputnik, when he was abroad and 2 x with Pfizer when he was back in Germany, because Sputnik is not recognised there) in a very short time frame: This man TESTED NEGATIVE for both spike protein and nucleocapsid, which led him to conclude, that important people had gotten a placebo or vitamin shot. I have also heard of Pfizer and Biontech having charges exclusively for their employees.
Jikkyleaks was able to verify the specialized batches for employees.
Yes there are definitely different lots with different ingredients. I think they realized that they couldn't have everyone (or even a majority of people) dropping dead/becoming ill immediately after getting vaccinated, or else the sheep might actually start to catch on. Getting vaccinated and taking subsequent boosters is exactly like playing Russian roulette with a loaded revolver... the more doses you take (each time you pull the trigger), the higher the chance that you're going to catch a bullet to the head. Of course, some people are just unlucky and get the bullet the first or second time.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109
https://thehotstar.net/separatebatches.html
You're right.. there's so much variability, it's almost impossible to know if someone got a high dose or nothing at all.
What are the gold standards for testing for vaccine toxicity?
Spike protein immunoassay may only detect active spikes, but it can't detect damage from previous spike proteins, nor can it detect if the mRNA was reverse transcribed into DNA for later reactivation (does reactivation occur? under what conditions?)
Nucleocapsid immunoassay is irrelevant for vaccines, but can show evidence of natural covid infection.
D-dimer and thrombin - are these useful for detecting amyloid calamari, or are they specific to regular platelet clots?
Anything else that might be useful for estimating dose / damage?
"does reactivation occur? under what conditions?'
... CHILLING
This is something my team is working on.
Godspeed. I am definitely waiting for the article on this one!
From Emerald Robinson
I would want my vaccinated loved ones to get these basic screening tests:
Complete blood count with differential and platelet count
D-Dimer
Troponin
CRP
Fibrinogen
Factor VIII
von Willebrand factor (vWF)
I am sorry, but I am not a doctor. My advice for you would be to adopt a healthy lifestyle and hope for the best.
Thankfully, I'm unvaccinated. I'm asking because I am searching for a partner for marriage. Unfortunately, so many suitable girls injected the gene therapy without considering the long term effects on health or fertility. So now I have to work out how much of a risk factor it is and how to adjust accordingly.
We already have fairly convincing data on decreased birth rates that suggests (if one extrapolates to 100% vax rate) that the vaccine reduces fertility by perhaps 20%. What we don't know is impacts on the long term health of children born to vaccinated parents (mother, father or both).
This was one of my initial worries about the vaccines which is why I tried to write on this subject early in the substack (and since that time the fertility declines have occurred).
You're right. We also don't know if the reduction is because vaxed couples have suffered a 20% reduction in fertility (with the implication that they'll get there eventually if they keep trying) or because 20% of vaxed couples have been rendered infertile.
We also don't know whether the fertility will recover or degrade further in time.
So many unknowns!!!
Also we don't know what kind of genetic changes will happen....Borg maturation chamber for children? Matrix anyone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2RIvJ1U7RE
If you want you have children, I would try to marry an unvaxxed woman. I am really concerned about the egg quality of vaxxed women, since a lot of the vax seems to have gone to the ovaries and menstrual irregularities seem to be widespread. I have also heard reports of calcified wombs, neonatal bloodclots etc. Additionally, there was a 4chan post in late 2020 of 2 people claiming to be working for Moderna, who said according to their research vaxxed people (1 vaxxed parent seems to be enough) would have daughters, whose ovaries would fail early. At the time the post was dismissed as conspiracy theory, but a lot of the things they claimed has since been proven true.
All of these reports are quantitative, ie. they're telling us what is happening, but they're not telling us how often it's happening, nor are they giving any diagnostic tools to see who might be affected. So given we don't have much qualitative data yet, it's really hard to estimate how bad the problem actually is.
Unvaxed is certainly the safe bet, but many countries are over 90% vaxed which means the available pool of unvaxed women is now less than 10% of what it was pre-covid.
Do you have any links for the moderna 4chan post? I'd like to see what else they say.
Bingo, that's the problem and why I am avoiding claiming rates I have no way to know.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ut24jn/4chan_moderna_leak/
The post on the top left
Ouch. It feels genuine. Unfortunately we still don't know if they'll be successful or not. The only thing we can do is either wait years for statistics, or do blood tests for estrogen levels or hCG/syncytin antibodies. Or, like you say, play it safe and avoid the vaxed.
Consider widening your search from your own countrymen/women who are the vaxxed masses to less vaxxed countries. That is, if you really want children.
That would be good advice even without the vaccine. Family values aren't what they used to be!
Many young women heard about the issues and remain unvaxed. Stick with that. Even if fertility is fine now, we don't know what subsequent generations will be like as we know this does enter the genome.
On the lighter side, perhaps all those half-human aliens doing testing on people came back from the future trying to find a genetic fix for themselves.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/humor/the-next-bitcoin/
Unfortunately, women tend to reach their critical thinking potential well after they've passed optimum marriage age.
Another thing that rarely gets a mention is the Chinese vaccine (Beijing Sinopharm / Sinovac). It's apparently an old style vaccine and I've heard far fewer concerning stories from the recipients, despite knowing many. It was widely deployed in a lot of Asian and Eastern European countries so maybe people dodged a bullet if they were lucky enough to receive this one instead of the Western mRNA/VV 'vaccines'.
I have also heard of far fewer side effects with Sinovac (China was very resistant to using the spike protein mRNA platform, which suggests they were aware of the potential issues with our vaccines)
That's encouraging, although I suppose the only way we could really settle this would be by surveys in countries outside China that used both gene therapies and Sinovac. Off the top of my head, that would be Mongolia, most of SE Asia, and some of Eastern Europe.
No it has side effects. Children developing Leukemia. There is no magic bullet to this. The technology is FLAWED and so are ALL the jabs. In short, don't mess with it, if it ain't broke goes double when you are injecting 'novel' treatments that diddle with your genome...
Do you have any links for that?
To be clear, I'm talking about the traditional Beijing Sinopharm vaccine, which was used by >95% of mainland Chinese vaccinees and probably a similar number of foreign recipients.
https://www.thehealthsite.com/news/chinese-covid-19-vaccines-sinopharm-and-sinovac-causing-blood-cancer-leukemia-in-recipients-867323/
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/chinese-covid-19-vaccines-causing-leukaemia-chinas-national-health-commission-document-reveals-report-article-90065350
https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/world/china-covid19-vaccine-caused-leukaemia-coronavirus-vaccine-chinese-health-commission-document-2022-03-08-763183
The first link didn't work for me, but I found a lot of other reporting by searching 'chinese national health commission leukaemia'
I can't find the original document - none of these sites link to it.
It will be less toxic but still pointless at best. The Chinese have been very good on medicine and have not generally followed the corrupt western model.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
There's a dating website for the unvaxxed called unjected, I believe it's unjected.com
Good call. There's not many profiles there but at least we know they're all unvaxed!
I also found another site unjabbed.dating but I'm not sure how real it is.
Leo, please do your homework.
https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/25/23277788/unjected-anti-vax-dating-debug-mode-data-covid
Have not scrutinized the other site yet.
I saw that and I wasn't too concerned. It was a new site and, given the political angle, it would have been under huge amounts of scrutiny from blue pilled pro-vax hackers.
Once is nothing - people make mistakes.
Do your homework.
https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/25/23277788/unjected-anti-vax-dating-debug-mode-data-covid
Leo -this site might be helpful in finding an unvaxxed woman:
https://www.unjected.com/
Please do your homework first.
https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/25/23277788/unjected-anti-vax-dating-debug-mode-data-covid
I won't be giving out that site again! Thank you!
There is no gold standard for testing vax for toxicity. Or anything. It’s a matter of a lab scientist back engineering a vial or multi vials from different batches and having a team of peer reviewed blind analysis. This was what Dr Wakefield and his team did… double blind analysis… then publish and get everyone to give in put (ten other qualified analyzing research scientists) … but even THAT is suppressed and lied about to the public.
Doctors will commonly assert things they in reality have no way to know the answer to. I don't like doing that. I could see any of these being possible:
•Those who had no issues initially will be fine.
•Those who had no issues will have something scary like a nasty cancer pop up in the future.
•Those who had no issues will have the aging process in their bodies be accelerated.
Your reply is frustrating, yet the only correct one!
When do you estimate we'll have enough data to reasonably estimate these possibilities? 1 year? 5 years?
I’m pretty sure we have enough data… it’s a matter of how long it can continue to be suppressed.
BTW, January, 2023, Japan began an official investigation into excess mRNA vaccine deaths. Here are two professors speaking out (one, from, fittingly Hiroshima University, home of that other mass death event) on Twitter https://twitter.com/i/status/1607008929430769665 abd Prof. Shigetsoshi Sano from Kochi Univ. https://twitter.com/i/status/1607008954844078080 Says the article, “Prof. Shigetoshi Sano of the Kochi University School of Medicine discussed discovering spike proteins at the site of skin lesions and other skin problems on patients who were vaccinated. “The spike protein derived from the vaccine was found in the skin,” Sano explained, highlighting a slide showing a bright green region on a lesion made visible by a special dye. Spike proteins are locally suppressing the immune system,” Sano told reporters. “As a result, the spike proteins facilitate in reactivation of the herpesvirus.” The process of the spike proteins degrading in the immune system prompts inflammation throughout the body that also leads to blood clots, Sano concluded. “The function of the spike proteins to produce adverse reactions is formation of blood clots,” Sano explained. “And even worse, spike proteins can also locally induce inflammation.”
Agreeing that a suppressed immune system makes someone more vulnerable to infection, Sano went on to say, “I don’t know if I should say this, but it has been found that vaccinated people are more likely to get coronavirus than unvaccinated people.” “Sometimes, things that are not good are introduced into the human body. Vaccination may cause our overall immune system to fail to fight against such bad things,” he warned. The doctors’ investigations come as Kyoto University Prof. Emeritus Dr. Masanori Fukushima slammed Japan’s Ministry of Health for refusing to halt its Covid vaccination program, citing data showing a number of adverse reactions and deaths stemming from the jab.”
Is this suspicion of the vax “conspiracy theory” among 120 million Japanese too? And speaking of conspiracy theory, maybe people just don’t want to be lab rats in the government’s secret experiments, which as John Whitehead wrote, “which include MKULTRA and the U.S. military’s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men (even the idiot NPR gets it https://www.npr.org/2015/06/22/415194765/u-s-troops-tested-by-race-in-secret-world-war-ii-chemical-experiments ).
Indeed, you don’t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation’s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins. Unfortunately, the public has become so easily distracted by the political spectacle out of Washington, DC, that they are altogether oblivious to the grisly experiments, barbaric behavior and inhumane conditions that have become synonymous with the U.S. government, which has meted out untold horrors against humans and animals alike. See lawyer John Rutherford article here https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/from_mind_control_to_viruses_how_the_government_keeps_experimenting_on_its_citizens
And why might people be suspicious? How about this, as just one snip from the first week or two of Jan. 2023: Young CTV News reporter Jessica Robb starts slurring her words, appears to go into medical #distress, and looks like she’s about to #collapse live on air during the 6pm show tonight. https://twitter.com/i/status/1612290120799129602
Or Imo Essian at a NCAA basketball came: Essien fell and could not get back up before trainers rushed to his aid on-court, story here https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/college-basketball/article-11616643/Old-Dominion-basketball-player-collapses-court-NCAA-basketball-game-vs-Georgia-Southern.html
Or this 16-Year-Old Basketball Player Suffers Stroke While in School https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/16-year-old-basketball-player-suffers-stroke-school/
Or Cadet Hunter Brown at U.S. Air Force Academy, who early January, 2023 died while on his way to class. https://gazette.com/military/air-force-academy-cadet-football-player-collapses-dies-on-way-to-class/article_deb0d2e8-9139-11ed-88a4-833985d0730c.html Brown was a reserve offensive lineman for the Falcons' football team. He died almost the same time the NFL’s Damar Hamlin collapsed, and the same time that WCCO – CBS in Minnesota announced that sudden cardiac arrest is leading cause of death in young athletes. But pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, as the Wizard told Dorothy. But you might want to pay attention to Dr. Peter McCullough discussing this issue, here https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/nfl-star-drops-suddenly-with-peter-mccullough-md-mph/, or Dr. Chris Martenson - PhD in pathology, Duke Univ., with a report soon after the event here, where he adds that science ‘has to consider everything.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSx5OC0zj-E
One of the really interesting questions the Japanese discovery raised for me was if shedding could be occurring through the skin.
It is despicable that those harmed have been ignored and shunned. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Any nurse or physician that does not recognize the possibility of harm from an experimental drug cannot be trusted and should have their license taken away.
I wrote more on this topic here:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-medical-blindness
It's not medical blindness by the hospitals, its willful corruption. My daughter who suffered from seizures, 12 month long diarrhea and inability to eat after the booster shot was again rushed to hospital with a seizure. They put her on a ventilator and after her subsequent death called it aspiration pneumonia (Covid ?). Thus my girl allowed them to bump up their income by 'dying' of the lucrative virus.
I'm so sorry. That's horrifying.
1st lesson. Never volunteer for any medical test if all your medical costs for the next 10 years are not covered, no matter the cause. Lifetime medical costs forever if the test is possibly responsible for lifelong maiming. No limit on punitive damages.
Everyone however just assumes they will be honest and treat them like the heroes they are made out to be at the start of the trial.
Thank you for this thorough explanation - I feel like I'm enrolled in an educational course. The kind we wistfully remember from the days when real knowledge was shared and real thinking was encouraged.
I would just add that lust for money isn't enough to explain the shameless lying and betrayal of human values. IMO, this is the statement that hit the mother-lode of the "why" factor underneath:
"Many organized religions throughout history have sought to control their populations by monopolizing the truth, and modern science is no different..."
Absolutely right. Modern science has become an organized religion. And not just another one, but a triumphalist religion that is determined to displace all others, at any price.
The "holy of holies" where they decided to set up their idol is in the area of human health, and particularly mental health. After all, the human body is the temple of the human soul.
It's no coincidence that the first director of the so-called "world health organization" was George Brock Chisholm, who wrote in 1946 that objective moral conviction was "a psychological distortion". He believed that psychiatrists have the sacred duty to free humanity from "the crippling burden of good and evil" by the "eradication of the concept of right and wrong".
(source: The Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress, in Psychiatry: Journal of the Biology and the Pathology of Interpersonal Relations, 9:1, Feb. 1946)
That legacy, all grown up, is what we are fighting today. These people regard themselves as "freed" from all those "poisonous certainties" that afflict morally upright beings.
Never forget the spiritual dimension in this war. It's the only way to explain the apparent lack of conscience in the WHO's joint venture with Big Pharma to control us all, body and soul.
That quote about the founder of the WHO is fascinating and may end up in a future article...
Just to clarify, Chisholm didn't found the WHO. It was a creation of the UN. But he was a key person on the planning committee, he was Exec. Sec. when they were getting organized, and he was elected the WHO's first Director-General two years after publishing the amoral crap I quoted.
Many thanks indeed for flagging him up. I see Wikipedia says he had communist beliefs.
I cease to be surprised by the anagrams of people's names.
'blemish chg crook ogre' and 'bickers hogger Moloch' are a couple. I may do more detailed analysis but you can see the links.
FYI - You can find the entire screed online. If I remember right, I downloaded it from the Internet Archive site for free.
(I haven't read the whole thing myself... I get too upset after a few pages and I have to take a break.)
"Never forget the spiritual dimension in this war." Well said.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/covid-19-summary/
EpochTV created an excellent documentary about aluminum and other adjuvants in vaccines (for people AND animals), which includes the women mentioned in this article (if I remember correctly). Here are the details, with quotes from the description:
September 23, 2022 EPOCH CINEMA | Under the Skin | Documentary
https://www.theepochtimes.com/under-the-skin-documentary_4736070.html
Description:
“Under the Skin” brings a topic to the public’s attention that concerns us all: the safety of vaccinations. No medical measure interferes more intensively with the mechanisms of the immune system. At the same time, we live in a time when nearly half of the population suffers from allergies, autoimmune diseases, or other disorders of the immune system.
Bert Ehgartner is specifically interested in the role of aluminum compounds, which are used as adjuvants in two-thirds of vaccinations: Why is this toxic metal compound needed? And who checks that those vaccinated are as healthy after the sting as they were before? The drug authorities care little about this, as the film shows with the example of the market launch of a new type of vaccine. Instead of the safety of the population, they stand up for the interests of the corporations.
Bert Ehgartner, born in 1962 in Austria, is a multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker and author of non-fiction books in which he takes a critical look at medical issues. With his investigative documentary “Age of Aluminum,” he triggered a broad discussion about the danger of using toxic aluminum compounds in sensitive areas of life (deodorants, medicines, drinking water). “Under the Skin” is the follow-up film and sheds light on the role of aluminum additives in vaccinations.
Thank you for flagging this. I will watch it this week!
One thing I can never get my head around is why people agree to be a trial subject. What possible advantage is there to a person assuming this risk? Then some allow their children to be subjects; this blows my mind.
Does anyone have an answer other than sheer stupidity?
If you completely trust the medical system, then it very easy to see how one could conclude it was safe to do and a civic duty to enroll.
I'm going to research where and when this idea of civic duty started. It seems to me to be a controlling construct to seduce one into compliance.
I would add pride.
Great report.
All vaccines are posion- end of story. The level of damage that has been caused by vaccinations over the past hundred years and more is incalculable.
Not only is the entirety of the "vaccine story" nothing but a pack of lies but as part of that story the society wide, short term and long term damage caused by these poisonous injections has been actively concealed by Big Pharma, the medical establishment, politicians as well doctors and nurses themselves.
My hope is that COVID-19 will make people start taking a deeper look at the other vaccines rather than writing off criticisms of them as a conspiracy theory.
It has - I was totally bought into vaccines and thought anti vaxxers were nuts. Now I don't trust any vaccine. I'm not willing to say they're all harmful or useless, but I would be very reluctant to get another one for anything.
Vaccines are all utterly pointless at best and I used to think they were of some use but not for the 'flu as I heard of people getting sick anyway. My link if you are interested.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
I think it has.
I'm also hoping that the conversation will expand to the deeper motives and the scope of the "Covid Operation" in order for people to better understand the Biosecurity apparatus as a whole.
We need to be having more of these types of conversations in the "Covid skeptics movement."
If the "vaxx" is stopped but the tyranny remains the same the next set of "health emergencies" will be upon us shortly. If the tyranny is halted then the "vaxx" programs are disappeared with it.
COVID 19 was designed so that people would wake up to the gross fraud. The whole thing was/is so absurd that only the terminally dim would continue to their doom. The rest would wake up in various stages as we see.
Hello and thank you very much. The whole things is so awful, but the truth is this has gone on for decades right back to Edward Jenner who was a fraud and paid handsomely for the privilege.
Re "I periodically encounter people with complex issues who get much worse from MRIs".
I mentioned my experience to you. I have read about others online who have had issues. I strongly suspect that it might have been the cause of my tinnitus which is relatively mild and might have been partly responsible for my deafness in left ear.
I said before that Gadolinium is a heavy metal with no place in our bodies. I believe if it is not readily flushed after the scan then there are likely to be problems. Given that there are apparently cheaper and safer options based around iron it is reprehensible that gadolinium is still used. But it is always about money for big pharma, the people involved in it are not interested in our health.
Big pharma must be destroyed once and for all for their lies and deceit, the harms and deaths it has caused. The death penalty is the only recourse for the monsters that commit these crimes.
In 2019 I was injured by the Shingrix vaccine with the first injection. Seven or eight days after the first injection I began having severe nerve pain in my arms, hands, lower legs and feet. I was able to see an associate of my PCP in the local University of Michigan clinic. She didn’t know what was causing the pain but assured me it was not the vaccine. She said she had attended a lecture given by the infection control physician at UM and this was not a side effect. She told me to take Tylenol. I went home, took Tylenol that didn’t help. The following night the pain was so bad my husband drove me to the UM ER where I sat in the waiting room for several hours. Finally, I was taken back to lie on a gurney in the hallway. The attending eventually examined me and assured me it was not the Shingrix vaccine. I continued to suggest that it was the vaccine. I am a registered nurse and felt I was using critical thinking skills to put things together. I was examined by several doctors for such things as stroke. A CT scan was done( I was 76 years old then). Eventually, they called the neurology team to examine me. They determined I suffered from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), on the spectrum for Guillame-Barre Syndrome that was likely caused by the Shingrix vaccine. They started me on gabapentin that eventually controlled the pain. Most of the symptoms have resolved, but I still have numbness in my feet with muscle spasms. My balance is effected. I made sure I had all the documentation of this and that it was sent to the CDC. GBS is now listed as a possible side effect of Shingrix.
Needless to say, I told my PCP that I did not want to take the COVID vaccine. He agreed we should wait and see. I have persevered and not taken the vaccine. I am so glad I have not taken the vaccine even though I did contract COVID just before Christmas in 2022.
My experience is what led me to begin doing research about the vaccine and early treatment options for COVID in early 2020. I’ve been following Drs. Kory, Malone, McCollough and now you. Thank you for all you do to educate us. I have learned so much and am questioning all vaccines now. This is of benefit to my family and friends. I am grateful for you all.
Thank you!
My current perspective that the primary value of vaccines is when they are used therapeutically rather than as preventatives. In virtually every preventative scenario (except for a few vaccines in subharian africa) the risks clearly outweigh the benefits of the vaccines. When they are used as a therapeutic (e.g. Bcg for bladder cancer or rabies for a rabies bite), the risks are still there but there is a much more probable benefit which can arguably outweigh the risk.
Vaccines are still pointless. There is the neutralizing effect of one poison on another as I referenced to in my sodium nitrite post, but no point using a vaccine as they are only meant to stimulate an immune response on the basis that it would 'train' the immune system.
But it doesn't train it and never has, that was part of the big fraud.
This makes much more sense!!
In your initial statements you describe what happens with clinical trial participants as akin to an abusive relationship. In 2009 I hosted a forum called Our Bodies, Our Souls featuring Jennifer Lahl of the Center for Bioethics and the Culture. She was working on egg farming or what she called Eggsploitation and documented how young women at prestigious colleges were manipulated to embrace egg donation as a caring thing they can do to help those couples who cannot conceive on their own, to say nothing of earning a nice paycheck. Once a problem occurs, and she had documented evidence, the rug is pulled out from under the person, and they are left to fend for themselves. If there are side effects preventing the eggs from being harvestable, the young woman is left alone to deal with the physical damage including hospital bills as well as emotional distress because she 'broke the contract'. There is no governmental oversight, or wasn't at the time. I doubt, seeing what has been happening with the Covid debacle, that oversight has improved in the last ten years! Callous is too nice a word for it, but it is a big industry. They make money and too often, the donor suffers. This has been going on a long time, in many areas of 'health care' and I am glad it is now coming to light. The light purifies.
I read about this after two people asked me if they should do it. That is a great example too.
Well said.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
28% know someone who has died from being vaccinated for COVID. How in the world do you quantify and qualify the deaths do to the vaccine in people who have died later? For example, I have two friends who both have cancer that has come up since being vaccinated. One had a recurrence of a cancer she was deemed clear of 15 years ago and she had an additional cancer come up with it. The original was discovered when she went in for an MRI for orthopedic surgery. Had she not gone in, she would most likely be dead now. She is on experimental long term chemo. The other person had trouble breathing, went to the ER and they found a clot in his lung. With other tests while there they discovered 2 forms of bladder cancer (one being very rare). He is almost done with chemo. Both healthy, one is athletic. Do these two get counted or are they just lumped in with cancer not at all caused by the shot? It is a real problem with real people with lives at stake.
Finally, thank you for presenting this. It was hard to watch and angering to read. I join those praying for all the brave people here. Especially the suffering.
I was at lunch in a resteraunt over the weekend and on the next table over, I listened to someone talk about how her mother had developed a rapid unusual cancer over the last year that was baffling the doctors involved which had started a year ago and the treatment for it had now left her close to needing hospice. Although they commented on how scary it is that something like that could appear out of nowhere (especially since she had none of the classic risk factors like being a smoker and worked very hard to stay healthy) I could not help but notice them mention that she had also been fully vaccinated not long before this all started.
I think there are a LOT of people out there like my friends and the ladies at the table near yours. I cannot believe they considered the vax. Neither patients nor doctors here even mention it. I wonder if in the dead of night patients and doctors who appear deluded wonder "what if it is the shot?". They appear to treat it as normal that say they are utterly healthy and biking over 80m/wk to then getting a lung blood clot and then 2 bladder cancers one of which is rare. Maybe their mind won't let them. I have contemplated mailing him an anonymous note with this stack address with this particular day's entry. For some reason I am hand wringing over whether to do that. Knowledge sometimes makes people lose it. But I don't want them to take another booster. Dilemma.
You must do what makes your own conscience free the rest is in their hands then not yours. You can then be at peace.
I avoid all big pharma drugs like the plague. Experimental chemo will not bode well. This is some of my story.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/02/04/world-cancer-day/
You ain't seen nothing yet.
Red Deer was right.
With all the egregious violations at every turn it really does look like a pLandemic
Is the term "soft" fraud some kind of star on the forehead for people who are creative enough to generate obfuscation? Fraud is fraud. Creating an even more insidious less easily discernable kind of fraud arguably warrants harsher terminology and sentencing, not lighter, because it constitutes two crimes instead of just one.
I made the term up to explain my own observations.
I hope these victims start a class action suit.
I do too. I am trying to bring attention to this (and I hope others do too) so the ball can get rolling.
Thank you for writing this!
Thank you for your long time support too!
Dr Sprout (or whoever) is clearly covering for Moderna. It’s comical how she is talking. 100% Criminal “care” by Head of Trial.
I had the Moderna vaccine and I had no trouble. However, everyone is different in their reactions. My son would not get the vaccine and now I think he was right
I used to work for an insurance company and they would try to make things difficult because they thought people would give up and not press the claim then the claim would disappear. I used to meet with the president of the company and had to argue to pay for the treatment to save the young man. Fortunately I was successful.
These mRNA trials were a fake. They should have lasted at least 10-12 years and used people of all kinds, not just the healthiest. They harmed many participants, but the results were completely fake.
Another reason to stay away from Doctors unless it's an emergency!!!!!!!
EXCLUSIVE Special Report: Medical profession implements WHO digital diagnosis code for the unvaxxed. Doctors will be ‘incentivized’ by the government to start asking more questions about your vax status
https://leohohmann.com/2023/01/17/exclusive-special-report-medical-profession-implements-who-digital-diagnosis-code-for-the-unvaxxed/#more-12549
"It is my belief after many years of research and teaching on this subject, that for every patented pharmaceutical drug making billions of dollars for the medical system, that there are natural remedies created by God found in nature that are actually more effective, especially if we stop believing in the allopathic germ-theory of disease, and realize that health is much more than just the condition of our physical bodies."
The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Mark of the Beast?
https://created4health.org/the-satanic-roots-to-modern-medicine-the-mark-of-the-beast/
If they make that code it will backfire bc it will show they are much healthier and make it very easy to track.
Doesn't matter...........Doctors have NO right to ask a patient if they are vaxed or not!
And you know as well as I do......99% of ALL doctors WILL ask that question.
Very well said. I am not PC.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/04/14/mark-of-the-beast/
Our health agencies are controlled by psychopaths. I don't know what else to say about all of this. They must be destroyed and be rebuilt but I'm not holding out much hope of that. Our health is up to us now because there is no one else to trust.
There is a much bigger issue here. Please look at the work of Sasha Latypova and others who have exposed information about the role of Department of Defence in this nightmare.
The following video is an excellent summary of their work, as explained by Dr Phillip Altman who is speaking out here in Australia. Highly recommend you make time to watch it.
https://rumble.com/v24hn92-under-the-wire-presents-dr-phillip-altman-us-military-involvement-in-covid-.html
Another great article, and you articulate/ prove what I feel. Namely, there has been a vast societal shift in the last 30 years or so.
It seems the system is corrupt, and we're near the End of the Empire.
I don’t know how to reach out to Olivia T. But she would greatly benefit from The Root Cause Protocol therootcauseprotocol.com.
That really helped a few of my (non-vaccine injured) patients and did nothing for the others who tried it.
It’s definitely not a quick fix, but overall the best support for the body. RCP plus tending to one’s microbiome - l. reuteri and l. gasseri probiotic home made yogurt.
Off topic, but what is your opinion on vitamin K injections for newborns?
I'm having to re-evaluate all interventions at this point.
Some people believe they case a lot of problems. I'm familiar with the arguments, I don't know what the actual magnitude of the issue is, and believe it's best to just give K2 orally and avoid the potential issue.
It's unfortunate that metaphors like "her heart stopped" to describe a negative realization is so uncannily near the actual physiological side effect of vaccines these days that I feel compelled to caution using that phrase in anything other than a literal sense.
:*(
Great work. Shared on Gettr.
Thank you!
Janssen absolutely lied about side effects in Risperdal trials. Hope they get a Kinzhal!
Double blind RCTs are the fool's gold standard! They presume -patients- _clients or subjects_ always lie about their physiological responses. See the Maddie video. How much gadolinium did she get, and was she ever checked for renal function?
This "allergist" is an expert psychologist? Why didn't she just hypnotize Maddie back into normalcy, or prescribe her an antipsychotic? Obviously she ascribes those symptoms to a dybbuk (Yiddish for covid spelled backwards), known to Christians as an "unclean spirit". https://astutenews.com/2020/06/on-the-occult-meaning-of-the-term-covid/ (Chlorpheniramine functions quite well as an antipsychotic, and hasn't a thousandth the adverse side effects as chlorpromazine or risperidone (Dr. Frenck needs lots of both), as well as being OTC and immensely cheaper.) Why do doctors even bother to ask about symptoms, since they presume everything the "clients" say is a lie?
I tried to touch upon the issues with the psyche drugs in previous articles, but there's so much there I doubt I could ever fully do it justice.
Regarding Olivia's story, I watched the entire episode on The Highwire when it first aired. While I was watching it I noticed many of her symptoms were the same symptoms I have been experiencing for the
past three years.
I am unvaccinated. I did not get any Covid-19 vaccination.
I am 56 years old, a female. I went into menopause this year (periods have finally stopped).
Cue Olivia's story:
Olivia spoke of shoulder pain after the Covid shot.
Two years ago (2021, when I was 54 and in perimenopause, I was still having periods although not regular periods) I woke up with a frozen left shoulder. I did not damage the shoulder, it wasn't the result of injury. I could not move my shoulder higher than my elbow without terrible pain.
I had the exact nerve pain down my arm as Olivia. Frozen shoulder.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/frozen-shoulder/symptoms-causes/syc-20372684
I woke up with shoulder pain in August 2021. Again, I am unvcaccinated. My brother got his second Covid vaccine shot in August 2021. I spend a lot of time at my brother's house, coincidental or shedding? No one will ever know.
To my "I am not a doctor's" eye, Olivia had a frozen shoulder which many women get in perimenopause/menopause. It is a weird injury that pops up out of nowhere and then goes away on its own (usually a year later). My frozen shoulder disappeared a year later (August 2022) with no surgery needed.
Cue Olivia's story:
Two years after her Covid shot she has an itch on her back that didn't go away.
I have a constant itch on my back for three years (since 2020). Come to find out many women in perimenopause/menopause (mostly women aged 54-62) have itchy backs which could be the result of
Notalgia Paresthetica (nerve disorder).
https://www.healthline.com/health/notalgia-paresthetica#symptoms
Not much you can do about it. Seems Olivia wanted doctors to find some reason for her itchiness, and eventually the doctors said she may have T-cell Lymphoma a supposed slow growing cancer. My dad had lymphoma and died from chemo/radiation poisoning at the age of 56. I recommend Olivia NOT do chemo or radiation.
Cue OIivia's story:
She had a rash on her stomach and back. Three years ago (2020) I had a rash on my stomach and back. Come to find out I was allergic to a preservative in my bubble bath called methylisothiazolinone [MI]. Many people are allergic to this chemical and do not know it. This chemical is in many products.
https://www.consumerreports.org/consumerist/theres-a-preservative-that-can-give-you-an-awful-painful-rash-and-its-probably-in-your-bathroom/
Olivia's rash could also be some sort of shingles, a side effect of the Covid vaccines. My brother got shingles a few months after his second Covid shot.
Cue Olivia's story:
She states she had joint pain after the Covid shots. One year ago, I had joint pain in my wrists, legs and especially my ankles. I could barely walk in the mornings. The joint pain lessened after 3 months.
What am I getting at?
Sounds to me possibly Olivia is in perimenopause/menopause and many of her physical ailments are the result of hormones and/or side effects from the prescription drugs she takes. I had/have many of the same ailments Olivia had/has and I never had a Covid shot nor do I take any prescription drugs. I don't know Olivia's age, nor do I know if anyone asked her if she is in perimenopause/menopause.
Perhaps the Covid shot puts one into menopause early? Many women who have taken the Covid shots report problems with their periods. I know chemo put my sister into menopause.
As to her cancer diagnosis. I believe if one looks hard enough one can find cancer at anytime at any age. Seems she was looking for a diagnosis and the doctors found the cancer. However this is supposedly a slow growing cancer. Amazing.
I am NOT saying that the Covid vaccines did not cause Olivia's ailments. Any toxic chemical you put in your body will cause problems eventually. But I do not whole heartedly believe ALL her ailments were the result of the vaccines, and I question the cancer diagnosis.
Honestly, after I watched the Rigged segment about Olivia, my gut was telling me she may have an issue with hypochondria, and come to find out she enrolled in another clinical trial for headaches previously to the Covid trial.
I feel for Olivia's pain, as I had/have the same painful ailments, but running to the doctor for every ache and pain is not a life worth living. There are no magic pills doctors can give you. Sometimes you have to suck up to the pain and wait for your body to heal it on its own, even though it may take years.
Just my two cents.
Some of the symptoms Olivia had were highly abnormal and could not be explained by menopausal symptoms (e.g., her rash is very different from a standard rash).
That said, I have come across numerous cases of patients abruptly entering menopause after the vaccines (along with the many other significant menstrual abnormalities) which likely ties in with their tendency to accumulate in the ovaries.
Her itchy back and her rash were the first signs of the cancer. Also, she didn't have any shoulder pain whatsoever until immediately after she got vaxxed. So no shoulder pain her entire life -----> she gets the covid vax ------> the shoulder pain starts immediately in the same arm she received the vax and only gets worse with time, the damage is visible on an MRI, and this results in her needing shoulder surgery to regain function of her arm again. I'd say it was definitely a direct result of the vax. Just because you've also had shoulder pain (many of us have) and are unvaxxed, that doesn't mean that her shoulder pain isn't from the vax. Any of these health issues people are developing immediately after vaccination (blood clots, strokes, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, heart attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis, cancers, etc) are almost certainly due to the vaccine... and in the case of those who participated in the trials and developed health issues after getting vaccinated, those issues should've been investigated thoroughly and HONESTLY, and the vaccine should have either been ruled out or identified as the cause. Then the injury should've been included in the trial reports to the FDA, and so on and so forth. At least that's what should've happened in an honest world, but since we live in a world of rampant corruption and evil, these people are ignored and their injuries are swept under the rug.
Stonewalled
I saw something about Gates, I think, talking about making vaccines that are themselves communicable. So the entire population would end up "inoculated ".
Xxx love U evol xxX
everything varies on location like last visit of our estate etc every eternity of victory or lose loads like living life like last one of ours Vs very valid example ever especially (except. E.V.O.L
This is totally criminally sanctioned eugenics. Under the false pretense of being a Vaccine it is a Vaxxxination.
This was criminal. I know when you sign up for research, you might be harmed. But this is beyond anything I would believe, and this doctor did NOT provide care which the document stated.
I’m so sorry you had to go through this, blessings for healing in Jesus’s name
Listen to Dr Mike Yeadon on Substack before you ever get another “Covid” shot.
Just watching the Senator Ron Johnson (2) senate hearings made me mad couple years ago —on these ignored,lied to, pre-marketing study participants: called crazy, left alone, uncompensated —who were far from “anti-vaxers” but wanted to BENEFIT America by participating. That #Pharma, and “#Fauxi old #Fauci” WPULD NOT EVEN ATTEND, is abhorrent. And all our worst suspicions came true as even Trump backed off from the “crony capitalist” vaccine —but Biden preemptively PARDONED Fauxi Fauci, (and so many others) who we learned had paid Wuhan to make COVID 19; and all we were deplatfoemed, social-media “jailed” and “demonetized” has proven true or WORSE than we had assumed / feared.
The trial participants offered themselves as guinea pigs. They made themselves worthless. Their lives meant nothing. That is what it amounted to then and it is very sad.
Ivermectin helps cure cancers…
Beautiful
Insurance companies are criminal! All big Pharma is evil! For me, I would never be in a trial! Sorry all this happened to you! I hope your healing
Silver shamrock… silver shamrock…
Everything they do is rigged
A lot of them had terrible circumstances and of course no of it was publicized!
I know 100% of the animals who were tested in the first trials decades ago all perished within a few years and Delores Cahill of Ireland was 100% correct in her assessment of the Cytokine Storm many have gone through or will go through in the very near future.
Lawsuit!!!!
Why does this say “Brought to you by Pfizer”?
Did her primary doctor ask if she received the vaccine?
I know I am late to the party on this post (catching up on a lot of backreading), so I hope you get to see this comment.
I'm an attorney, and I see and appreciate your distinction on "soft" and "hard" fraud. I'd like to share a legal barometer with you:
After the 1929 crash, the federal government established the SEC and passed two acts that went along with it to ensure that we would not have such a crash again. In one of those acts, the 1934 Act, is a rule numbered 10b-5, which states that a material omission of fact in shareholder documents (e.g., a prospectus) is as much of a fraud as a blatant misrepresentation.
So for example if I was selling shares in a company and disclosed that the company had $100mm in revenue but failed to disclose that it had $100B in debt, that’s fraud.
This would be your soft vs hard fraud distinction, and all I am sharing is that you're being very kind in labeling one as "soft" because under our law, they're both fraud -- no qualification needed.
Thanks for all your amazing posts! I've shared your substack posts with many people.
Thank you; I really appreciate it. One of my goals on here has been to provide a lot of the legwork that can be used by lawyers in the future when they go after these companies.
Also, I have friends who work in the financial sector and they've essentially told me that by far the most honest information you ever get from pharmaceutical companies are the reports they give to shareholders for precisely the reason you are stating.
You're doing yeoman's work; a massive service to humanity. Thank you for all you do!!
You say you are an attorney. What is your name, where do you practice, and what is your relationship to Dr. Pierre Kory? Do you represent him?
You're out of line, Charles, asking this comment on a thread not related to where I questioned your evidence throwing shade on Dr. Kory. Stay in your lane on your substack.
Goodbye.
LMAO. You're a coward, Charles. You took a quote from Dr. Kory COMPLETELY out of context, made a bunch of false assumptions, and have no spine when someone merely questions the facts behind your allegations. There were no allegations in my comments ... just basic factual questions, which you were unable to answer. You have proven that you are not only reckless in your analysis but also, based on your responses to me, inept in your reading comprehension. Then you come and hunt me down on someone else's substack, ROFL! and then write to me here "goodbye"? 😂😂 I feel sorry for you, Charles.
I'm in Australia and from 31st July all records of vaxxed had to be destroyed, this included school children as well. Is this conveniently so there is no paper trail for future comeback regarding deaths and serious injury due to the toxic poison they put into the majority here?
Could an advert in the newspaper be used to ask for participants to come forward and see if any other adverse effects were removed by removing participants etc.
They might have stories to tell.
Did people see this documentary from 2016? If this isn’t compelling against vaccines, not sure what is.
https://rumble.com/v1rciiq-vaxxed-ii-the-peoples-truth-documentary-must-see-the-level-of-evil.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Thanks, very good article. On one point you're still a bit too optimistic: "the one thing that is very difficult to hide is the total number of deaths (as they cannot be reclassified to something else)". Yes they can!
Pfizer reclassified at least one death in the vaccine group.
https://infocheckers.org/wiki/Blog:Pfizer_omitted_at_least_one_vaccine_trial_death
While we have been duped about the Covid injection, let's remember to protect our kids from this huge childhood vaccine schedule. Before you know it Big Pharma will have all the vaccines on this schedule part of the Mrna platform. Follow Dr. Fauci's reign. Has our health gotten better in the US over the last 40 years? We defintely meet 3rd world status, with the most spent for healthcare in the world.
I remember from around 2020/1 reading that that the jabs were being trialled in South Africa and a participant or his family sued for damages as he was badly damaged or died. Obviously that did not get much media coverage but even back then I was keen to know what was going on. I now know that the trials were a farce and all for show, anyway as legally they were not even required as the jabs were not covered by pharmaceutical laws.
"Covid-19 vaccines” are biowarfare agents, legally not medicines, not pharmaceuticals, and not regulated as such.
Use of Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) covered countermeasures under a declared Public Health Emergency cannot constitute a clinical investigation (21 USC 360bbb-3(k)), therefore these countermeasures could not be tested for safety or efficacy in accordance with US law (21 CFR 312 and 21 CFR 601), nor could compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) or Good Distribution Practices (GxP in general) be enforced by the FDA.
This legal fact was known to the US Government, DOD, BARDA, FDA, CDC, HHS officials signing the contracts, involved in the OWS, and it was also known to Pfizer, Moderna and other pharma companies. mRNA technology has always been designated dual-use, a category of bioweapons".
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-role-of-the-us-dod-and-their
This SubStack has done such great work on exposing what occurs in the clinical trial process. It was shocking to realize how badly people are treated when they are injured. I cannot imagine the torment of the victim in the above video....I was quite disgusted therefore when I came across this piece from 2012 in the AMA Journal of Ethics which discusses the idea of mandating participation in clinical vaccine trials due to increasing need and declining enrolment. This is the AMA policy forum, and we know industry often writes the entire policy then passed by government. The authors in this piece liken it to jury duty. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/should-participation-vaccine-clinical-trials-be-mandated/2012-01
Thank you for sharing this link. I will use it.
I should say the many victims. I am only on the first video! Horror story but what makes it so much worse is the utter abandonment by Pharma and their utter disregard for the lives of trial participants who were harmed by their product.
”A dose of adversity is often as needful as a dose of medicine.”
If by "medicine" we mean covid jabs, then "as needful" means none of them were needed.
Can we stop asking the question of "when did they know the vaccine wasn't safe"? The industry deliberately designed it to kill. All these parasite vampire squid CEO's of/in big pharma are Davos and WEF acolytes. The great reset, penned by Charles the buffoon Schwab, but actually are the plan of a sleepless malevolent entity that desires the destruction of all things created.
I'm an absolute ANTI-VAX tin foil hat wearing conspiraloon who is now held in the reverse esteem as at the beginning of the plandemic when everyone thought I 'just don't care about others'.
Another enlightening article. Thanks Doc! I'm one of those laymen without a medical degree, but have always been highly skeptical of pharmaceutical companies. I'm also a USMC veteran and was administered anthrax vaccines back in 1998/1999 that I took against my will. Something I always look back at in disgust. Anyhow, what's your take on Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who in April 2019 resigned as the Top Dog of the FDA, to then coincidentally take a seat on Pfizer's board in July 2019? Was there some foreshadowing taking place there? Did Scott Gottlieb have a crystal ball to know that he'd be making a "killing" (both literally and figuratively) from the covid vaccines? I looked all this up on Pfizer's wikipedia in the summer of 2021 when I discovered Pfizer was one of the key manufacturers, because my gut told me the whole thing stank of fraudulence. Now Dr. Gottlieb appears to have a spotlight on him in various media outlets. Rightfully so, I suspect. Keep up the outstanding work!
Any person who participates in these clinical trials (in this case the moronic parents) deserves everything that they get. Any parents brain dead enough to risk their child's health, without that same child being given an equity share in the company, the patents and the eventual profits deserves this. They deserve to be injured, so that somebody else can profit massively from their stupid risk. You won't find the management's children doing this. The Pharma management and major shareholders are not that f***ing stupid. Any parents that are that moronically stupid, their kids unfortunately will turn out exactly like them. Stupid needs to die out, unfortunately. Those clowns made billions and these moronic dic*heads do it for nothing, no equity stake in the profits whatsoever. There are some stupid humans out there indeed. There are the wolves and there are the sheep. Did these completely retarded parents see a lawyer before they signed the mountain paperwork that they would have signed. A lawyer would have stopped them from stupidly going ahead. No sympathy from me. These people are stupid and deserve to die. Their genetic line must end.
This is an absolutely AWESOME article! Thank you for taking the time to put this together. What you have described and detailed corresponds to what happened to a dear friend of mine with CLL. As best as I can tell from discussing with his family, he was put in a phase 3 clinical trial for a drug called ibrutinib. I did some research on the drug and I advised his daughter against taking this drug unless the doctors could explain what happens to the other 6 enzyme pathways that Bruton's tyrosine kinase (enzyme) interacts with? Per Wikipedia: Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), is a selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Bruton's tyrosine kinase has been shown to interact with GNAQ,[2] PLCG2,[3][4] Protein kinase D1,[5] B-cell linker,[3][6] SH3BP5,[7][8] Caveolin 1,[9] ARID3A[10] and GTF2I.[11][12][13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruton%27s_tyrosine_kinase Despite my concerns, the family went ahead with using the drug. They were very excited about it because the price for this drug was about $10K per month but they would be getting it for FREE. I asked about what informed consent was given before starting the drug? His wife said none. Apparently, they were only told about the potential benefits. A short time after being on the drug, my friend developed nearly EVERY side effect that I found listed for the phase 1 & 2 trials. I provided the information to his wife to discuss with the doc. The doc told her that the side effects including being in A fib was not from the drug! Once the drug did a good job of destroying any remaining functional white blood cells, the doc took him off the drug and presumably out of the trial. My friend died from sepsis due to a bacteria that is considered non-pathogenic. At the time of his death, his white cell count was zero.
:(
Thank you for sharing this story.
You might find this helpful. After my friend's diagnosis, I did some searches on PubMed. I found several papers that showed CLL could be treated with Green Tea Extract (EGCG). I forwarded this information to his family which they ignored in favor of the oncologists toxic recommendations. After 4 years of suggesting that his wife take him to my NMD for an evaluation, she finally took him after most of the damage was done. My NMD recommended liposomal Green Tea Extract! I offered to make a quart of liposomal green tea extract for him because my doc was not aware of any compounding pharmacy that could make it. When I told his wife that I recommended that the product be refrigerated, she refused to treat him with it because it would not fit in with her cruise ship travel plans. There are now some new articles posted on CLL & EGCG which might help others in the same situation.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646173/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16325256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124534/
I heard two PSA for ATTR-CM...I am wondering if the Midwestern Doctor could delve into this "diagnosis". I did a bit of digging and am not surprised if this "diagnosis" isn't coming to light to hide vaccine injury. Why not wrap up a lot of symptoms into a diagnosis so that people can feel good about being vax-injured (meaning they never know it was a vax injury). We can just tell people we now have imaging in order to find this magical diagnosis that we in the past missed? One of the sites "connecttoyourheart.com" brings you to a Pfizer-sponsored site "yourheartsmessage.com". This seems fishy to me! Then I looked into some of the drugs used to treat it...all new to the marker, first-in-class medications!
I wrote about this before and one of my colleagues has a relative with it (so we periodically discuss it). I'll be honest however, I am not an expert in the disease so I don't feel I can state much about it.
Doc,
First of all, thank you for all the work you do putting these articles together. They're quite lengthy and detailed, and I recognize how much effort you're putting into this.
I read this earlier in the day, but thought I'd go back through some of the videos. Started with Maddie's and was horrified for her and her family. Is there any funding mechanism set up to help that family?
I put it in the article (for her life funder).
I apologize. There is nothing more frustrating than putting something in an article, but people miss it.
Thanks again for all your work.
I'll tell you what really worries me most.
It's not that the government, media and Medical Profession are full of criminals. That can be rectified with effort.
The scariest thing is that the people, in general, are not capable of fixing it. They have been raised as waste products. Their most momentous achievement is working a video game controller. No skills, no intellect, and a head full of communist lies which they refuse to question. Nonfunctional, dysfunctional, malfunctional swaths of lemmings infesting what was once a society, and they are "the future"?
The American populace has been so dumb down they can no longer think rationally or logically and believe everything they are told by our worthless lying government, media and doctors.
What a sad future this Country has.......
Thus far mostly women with severe AEs. Wonder what percentage are male. What is the trigger if female vs male AEs are vastly higher? Question increased heart issues in males.
Healthy mid life sis inlaw diagnosed 6wks post 3rd inj with pancreatic ca small lesion. Passed 6wks following diagnoses with lg tumor. Hmm another coincidence.
Here's what happened to them:
SEE: https://ghostofjfk.substack.com/p/pfizer-data
Thanks for sending that to me again!
Please let us know when the adverse events kick in. And the mask.... whoa. If she worships science, she better know what it is first
Regarding Brook Jackson v.Ventavia v.Pfizer- complaint was dismissed. Still- there is interesting information in the below docs.
For example: In October 2020, FDA issued guidance regarding the data and information needed to
support issuance of an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 vaccines. The
guidance explained that FDA may issue an EUA after FDA has determined that the following
key criteria are met:
• Based on the totality of scientific evidence available, including data from adequate
and well-controlled trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that the vaccine may
be effective to prevent, diagnose, or treat such serious or life-threatening disease or
condition that can be caused by SARS-CoV-2.
• The known and potential benefits of the vaccine, when used to diagnose, prevent, or
treat the disease or condition that can be caused by SARS-CoV-2, outweigh the
known and potential risks of the vaccine.
On November 20, 2020, Pfizer submitted an EUA request to FDA for the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. (page 4). FDA had “full confidence in the data that were used to support the
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine authorization and the Comirnaty approval.(page 6).
The SOW, which is attached to the complaint, further specifies that the Army did not regulate the conduct of the clinical trial, which is “out-of-scope” for the purchase agreement between the Army and Pfizer.In short, the complaint does not plead factual content to support a conclusion that compliance with the clinical trial protocol or regulations was necessary under the contract between Pfizer and the Army.
So, the Army did not pay for the conduct of the study- leaving Pfizer and CROs to make sure they get the necessary data from clinical trials for EUA (although these data are submitted if available, per guidance issued in Oct2020), and so Army is not interested in clinical trial data quality, as this is not included in their agreement with Pfizer.
In the second document- Pfizer motion to dismiss the amended complaint- it is explained among others that Relator (Brook Jackson) may not pursue the claims against Pfizer without the Government first pursuing them in an administrative proceeding. Also, Relator’s views are impossibly at odds with the Government’s. She is not entitled to hijack the qui tam process to pursue an anti-vaccination agenda that the Government rejects. Also Pfizer Explains about operation warp speed, and that Such agreements are executed under DoD’s Other Transaction Authority(“OTA”) ,“Other Transactions are legally binding contracts that are generally exempt from federal procurement laws and regulations”. And the Government continues to make the vaccine “free to everyone age 5 and older living in the
United States, regardless of immigration or insurance status.”
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.10.04-jackson-v.-ventavia-us-gov-intervene.pdf
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.04.22-pfizer-motion-to-dismiss.pdf
SIRVA is a real issue with many vaccines. My dad had this condition after vaccination and the doctor made no connection to the vaccine. It took months to get the mri. Has anyone exposed this through a records request through insurance? I have heard of many cases of this and no reporting on it.
So, the internet means nada. However, below are SOURCE REFERENCES from the original studies, so you can verify (leave the fake news to CNN, MSNBC, Morning Joe -kster), CBC in Canada, PBS ad nauseam.
Dr. Makary at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Medicine with other scientists teamed up with the non-profit FAIR Health group to look at the insurance data of 48,000 children diagnosed with Covid between April 2020 and Aug. 2020. Not ONE of the children who died were free of pre-existing medical conditions such as cancer https://www.naturalhealth365.com/zero-covid-death-among-children-3920.html and here https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/06/covid-jabs-could-potentially-kill-thousands-of-kids-former-hhs-epidemiologist/ .
And this is true in Germany, too, where a massive study late fall showed ZERO – there’s that word again – deaths from Covid among healthy German kids, as reported by Alex Berenson here, Dec. 2, 2021, https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/huge-new-study-shows-zero-covid-deaths . Or see a the details in a late 2021 German study https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.30.21267048v1.full.pdf (collating evidence from three sources 1) a national seroprevalence study (the SARSCoV-2 KIDS study), 2) the German statutory notification system and 3) a nationwide registry on children and adolescents hospitalized with either SARS-CoV-2 or Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS-TS)) reported that there were zero (0) deaths in children 5 to 18 years old across the period of study. Ditto in Sweden - Swedish data by Ludvigsson https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33406327/ reported on the 1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2020) who were 1 to 16 years of age who attended school with largely no lockdowns or masks. They found zero (0) deaths. “Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.” If you include kids with serious morbidities, there were six deaths.
In Germany, out of a total population of 80 million, around 10 million school age kids. Even serious illness was extremely rare, 1 in 50,000. See Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s SWEDEN AND GERMANY: NO DEATHS IN CHILDREN DUE TO COVID https://brownstone.org/articles/sweden-and-germany-no-deaths-in-children-due-to-covid/ for more reading, or this article which notes that German scientists found that no healthy child 5-17 years of age died of COVID in Germany https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/autopsy-study-ties-deaths-to-covid-vaccine/
This is an exceptionally well written and researched article. Thank you for all your efforts. This has to be communicated to the Florida Grand Jury as the fraudulent research has to be revealed for all to see and those responsible held accountable.
As many have pointed out, in the comments, why would anyone ever volunteer again for a medical study given the unethical behavior of big Pharma? Big Pharma should have been all over the injection injured and treated them properly. No ethics no morals. From now on every vaccine will be questioned much more closely by everyone. Every drug, new and old, will have suspicion around it.
More emphasis also has to be given back to observational studies. It is only recently that observations were discounted, however, in the past all medical progress was made by observation. Two hundred years ago a doctor in London, during a cholera epidemic, noticed that those that got sick were drinking from a community well. He sealed the well and the epidemic subsided. Several years ago I was in Australia and the tour guide was talking about all the poisonous plants and that the aboriginals were able to tell the settlers what plants to avoid. I asked how the natives got their knowledge and he stated that if you misbehaved in the tribe your punishment was to eat a plant. If you lived the plant was deemed edible. Observation is a powerful tool and should never be ignored.
Another spectacular piece by you. I know I have gotten dozens of people to read your substack and the awakening is happening in full force. God Bless you.
Thank you for your support! My goal is quality over quantity so it's not a waste of other people's time to read these (since we are swimming in content online). It is always very surreal for me when I run into people who recommend this substack to me.
To your point, and why you are one of my two top Substacks to read. Quality vs Quantity. You balance this impeccably. In my opinion, this has hurt our good friend, Dr Alexander. He needs to stick to the science and filter what he thinks about sending. If you have any influence, please pass this along. I love that he is passionate about this, we need that, but there is always the economic principle that applies to everything ... the principle of diminishing returns.
The only way we can learn from history, is to know it! Dr. Fauci spent 43 years understanding HIV and that’s about the same time between the first Hep-B vaccine trials and Covid-19 mRNA vaccine trials.
Your documentation is sadly compelling…appreciate very much your care in this reporting.
Grant Imahara I bet
Dear AMD,
Most Substack articles (including most of yours) enable me to listen to as well as read them. Is it possible to set up this article for listening as well? I’ve watched the videos and skimmed the text, but listening to the articles is of great benefit while preparing meals, walking, etc.
I think that's because I mixed in the videos and I'm not sure how to get around that issue besides not putting the videos in (which is what I will typically do).
What happened to the participants in the 1978 Hepatitis trials, shortly before the outbreak of AIDS
Great that you mention that. I had a (now deceased) friend who knew many of the participants in those trials so I learned a lot about that debacle. I've avoided going into it because I felt it would be a bit too conspiratorial even for this relatively open minded audience.
The only way we can learn from history is to know it. Dr. Fauci spent 43 years learning about HIV, which is about the same time between Hep-B vaccine trials and Covid-19 mRNA vaccine trials.
Sorry
But I don't get your point.
?
Hepatitis-B vaccine was an experimental vaccine given to homosexuals and intravenous drug users in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles in 1978-1979.
I believe the theory was that they were an ideal cohort to test on as people would be unlikely to raise questions if they died (as they were less likely to have families and people would be more likely to attribute their death to life style choices). AIDS then broke out in the gay communities in those same cities.
The thing that made the people I knew so suspicious about the whole thing was how much focus was placed on the trial participants to monitor for unusual side effects throughout the whole trial (I meant to revist this topic with my friend who was intimately involved with the whole trial but he recently passed).
I will also note that there is a case to be made that AIDS was spread in Africa by a polio vaccine campaign (there was a tight correlation between the two and it was discussed in mainstream newspapers at the time).
Wow! Your knowledge is better than mine. Yes, Ed Hopper’s book The River explains the Africa origins by Dr. Hilary Kaprowski who says he never used chimpanzee kidneys to developer the polio shot, but employees and lab techs tell a different story. Here’s the thing, Homosexuals we’re given an experimental Hepatitis vaccine that was withdrawn just before HIV in the gay community and none of the trial participants were told in 1978, not to have unprotected sex, and compare with Tuskegee, where blacks were injected with syphilis and never told not to have unprotected sex. Lastly, why is HIV homosexual in America yet heterosexual in Africa. I refer you to Koch’s postulates.
So, in 43 years we learned nothing ?
The truth is never conspiratorial. As Dr. Robert Malone states often: The truth is like a lion. Let it out. It will defend itself. I would greatly appreciate knowing anything you wish to share anytime you feel confident about the content of your material.
Thanks and shared.
Thank you!
I put links for everything for you to verify. Leave the fake news to CNN, MSNBC, And Morning Joe the Jackass
January, 2023, Japan began an official investigation into excess mRNA vaccine deaths. Here are two professors speaking out (one, from, fittingly Hiroshima University, home of that other mass death event) on Twitter https://twitter.com/i/status/1607008929430769665 abd Prof. Shigetsoshi Sano from Kochi Univ. https://twitter.com/i/status/1607008954844078080 Says the article, “Prof. Shigetoshi Sano of the Kochi University School of Medicine discussed discovering spike proteins at the site of skin lesions and other skin problems on patients who were vaccinated. “The spike protein derived from the vaccine was found in the skin,” Sano explained, highlighting a slide showing a bright green region on a lesion made visible by a special dye. Spike proteins are locally suppressing the immune system,” Sano told reporters. “As a result, the spike proteins facilitate in reactivation of the herpesvirus.” The process of the spike proteins degrading in the immune system prompts inflammation throughout the body that also leads to blood clots, Sano concluded. “The function of the spike proteins to produce adverse reactions is formation of blood clots,” Sano explained.
“And even worse, spike proteins can also locally induce inflammation.” Agreeing that a suppressed immune system makes someone more vulnerable to infection, Sano went on to say, “I don’t know if I should say this, but it has been found that vaccinated people are more likely to get coronavirus than unvaccinated people.” “Sometimes, things that are not good are introduced into the human body. Vaccination may cause our overall immune system to fail to fight against such bad things,” he warned. The doctors’ investigations come as Kyoto University Prof. Emeritus Dr. Masanori Fukushima slammed Japan’s Ministry of Health for refusing to halt its Covid vaccination program, citing data showing a number of adverse reactions and deaths stemming from the jab.” Is this suspicion of the vax “conspiracy theory” among 120 million Japanese too? And speaking of conspiracy theory, maybe people just don’t want to be lab rats in the government’s secret experiments, which as John Whitehead wrote, “which include MKULTRA and the U.S. military’s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men (even the idiot NPR gets it https://www.npr.org/2015/06/22/415194765/u-s-troops-tested-by-race-in-secret-world-war-ii-chemical-experiments ).
Indeed, you don’t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation’s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins. Remember Tuskeegee? Remember the Guatemala experiments? Remember the military spraying San Francisco back in the 1950s? Unfortunately, the public has become so easily distracted by the political spectacle out of Washington, DC, that they are altogether oblivious to the grisly experiments, barbaric behavior and inhumane conditions that have become synonymous with the U.S. government, which has meted out untold horrors against humans and animals alike. See lawyer John Rutherford article here https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/from_mind_control_to_viruses_how_the_government_keeps_experimenting_on_its_citizens And why might people be suspicious? How about this, as just one snip from the first week or two of Jan. 2023: Young CTV News reporter Jessica Robb starts slurring her words, appears to go into medical #distress, and looks like she’s about to #collapse live on air during the 6pm show tonight. https://twitter.com/i/status/1612290120799129602 Or Imo Essian at a NCAA basketball came: Essien fell and could not get back up before trainers rushed to his aid on-court, story here https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/college-basketball/article-11616643/Old-Dominion-basketball-player-collapses-court-NCAA-basketball-game-vs-Georgia-Southern.html Or this 16-Year-Old Basketball Player Suffers Stroke While in School https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/16-year-old-basketball-player-suffers-stroke-school/ Or Cadet Hunter Brown at U.S. Air Force Academy, who early January, 2023 died while on his way to class. https://gazette.com/military/air-force-academy-cadet-football-player-collapses-dies-on-way-to-class/article_deb0d2e8-9139-11ed-88a4-833985d0730c.html Brown was a reserve offensive lineman for the Falcons' football team. He died almost the same time the NFL’s Damar Hamlin collapsed, and the same time that WCCO – CBS in Minnesota announced that sudden cardiac arrest is leading cause of death in young athletes. But pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, as the Wizard told Dorothy. But you might want to pay attention to Dr. Peter McCullough discussing this issue, here https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/nfl-star-drops-suddenly-with-peter-mccullough-md-mph/, or Dr. Chris Martenson - PhD in pathology, Duke Univ., with a report soon after the event here, where he adds that science ‘has to consider everything.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSx5OC0zj-E
"This essay was written by a physician colleague of mine, whose opinion I value greatly. The research, views and opinions are his own, not mine. I write this because he is covering a very sensitive topic. If one doesn’t tread very carefully, this is a topic that could put a scientist or a physician on a DHS terrorism watch list, or on the list of the President’s “dirty dozen.” Robert Malone
Huh? AMWD is a she. Or so "she" has inferred... perhaps I'm mistaken and Mr Malone is correct.
And I can understand why AMWD wishes to remain anonymous as a working doctor, but why is it bad for anyone else brave enough and not currently working as a "doctor" to join the good people on the dirty dozen list?
Great catch! I have 100% avoided disclosing my gender to protect my anonymity. Instead I let people assume what they wish to. Very few people know what it is and to my knowledge none of them have disclosed it.
Sorry.... putting this here rather than as a reply....
The Journal of the American Heart Association Research, in Occurrence and Features of Childhood Myocarditis: A Nationwide Study in Finland published in 2017, here, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005306 stated the background rate of myocarditis in youth, was four cases per million per year. Assuming 60 million American children, the background rate for myocarditis would be 240 cases a year. So how many cases of myocarditis have been reported to VAERS following COVID injection so far? 16,918 as of December 3, 2021. https://openvaers.com/covid-data And of course, it’s increasing several hundred to a couple of thousand every week.
“Doctors have never seen so many cases of myocarditis," Peter McCullough says. "It is frequent, and it is severe. My fear is, some of these kids who develop myocarditis will be in the 13% category where they have progressive left ventricle dysfunction and heart failure.” According to McCullough, 86% of youth who develop myocarditis in response to the jab are sick enough to require hospitalization. In fact, per Defender, here https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/deaths-vaers-covid-shots-vaccination/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=05cdb832-6ac0-4222-a830-9d80794471ca 21% of deaths reported to VAERS after Covid shots occurred within 48 hours of getting shot. For further reading, here’s where McCullough discusses an “astronomical” rise in myocarditis from the shot – here looking at a national study in Finland, published in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
Sitting next to him is the UK’s top doctor, Aseem Malhotra, who supported the shot… until he looked at the data. The background deaths per million is 4 before Covid; then it went to 62 cases per million, then a UC Davis study showed 250 cases per million…. Then a Kaiser Permannte study showed 527 cases per million… and as of early Jan. 2023, the Mansanguan et al study, along with one other study found 2,500 cases per million. ************That’s a 62,400% increase. **************** Don't believe me. Here's the Mansanguan, et al study, Cardiovascular manifestation of the BTN16b2 mRNA Covid Vaccine in Adolescents https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006288/
50 years from now, when the truth is out in the open, Midwestern doc will be one of those heroes everyone recognizes, such as like MLK is today
My hope is to fade into obscurity and be forgotten once what needs to be done has been done. The people who took on the personal risk to speak out publicly are the ones who should receive the credit when the time comes.
your articles are always awesome!
Thank you!
As I am not a paid subscriber to Malone's substack, I could not post this there.
I have to wonder what exactly got set as the standard process between when the FDA did not want to approve Prozac, Bush pushing approval through, and the about face of the FDA then burying critical information. This now seems to be the current process, where it wasn't before. I suspect it has to do with political pressures continuing due to growing campaign contributions.
https://khn.org/news/campaign/ Shows campaign conributions from 2007-2022. The amount has increased 7.75. Accounting for inflation, 2007 should have only increased 1.41 times. https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
The two things which seemed to really change the direction of the FDA were the SSRI approvals and them pushing through Aspartame (Rumsfeld was tied to its manufacturer and essentially had the same thing that happened with Bush and Eli Lily replay there).
Thank you again. This is one of those articles that reminds you just how deep in we are and how much f*#@ery has been afoot. After all this, do people really not see that something is wrong? I am starting to think this may be part of the point, however. The companies seem to be going on a “Fake it till you make it” attitude. One could argue that “making it” was getting the products onto the childhood vaccine schedule. After that, you just deny, deny, deny and, as you’ve written in several pieces, gaslight, gaslight, gaslight.
In a way, what is happening now reminds me of my family’s history in the USSR. When my grandma was young (Stalin years, 40s, 50s), everyone was scared and everyone either believed or at least pretended very hard to. By the time my parents were young adults (Brezhnev, 70s, 80s), no one really believed but you could still get in trouble for not toeing the line. So people pretended to believe but acted accordingly. Anyone believing what they read in the newspapers would be looked at askance, to say the least.
I wonder if this is not a sort of “divide and conquer” strategy which is always useful to divide the working (or at least non-elite) class. The whole “I can pay one half of the working class to kill the other half” type of thing. Maybe the more fault lines/divisions, the better for them. But could this go too far? Could all of these deaths and injuries really be swept under the proverbial rug? What would happen if there is a giant split into those who believe that everything is “safe and effective” and those who do not? I wonder if MWD sees anything like this happening in the medical community. In the USSR case, there was no big rebellion but the USSR did not last as an entity. In fact, the stakes over perestroika were huge: the whole political system hung in the balance, though no one may have realized…I wonder what hangs in the balance now?
P.S. I realize MWD is a busy doctor but reading and re-reading many of your articles has given me a lot to think about.
I will try to frame a few questions in a yes/no style and if you have any time to even put a y/n next to each, I would be much obliged. If not, I understand as well.
You write here about a sclerascope: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-every-vaccine-often-cause?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
This does not seem to be an instrument that is now widely in use. Would it be realistic/useful for me to acquire such an instrument and learn to use it to potentially detect vaccine injury on my young child?
Would asking for D-dimer and ESR tests following each injection of childhood vaccine in order to potentially detect any developing auto-immunity issues for a 2 or 3-year old be a reasonable request?
As you mentioned in a previous comment, keeping zeta potential at an appropriate level is important and that vaccines can destabilize this because of aluminum.
Is heparin a possibility for a young child?
As you mention in the article, electrolytes follow a u-shaped curve so overdoing it would not be a good idea, either, but what might be a nice supplement to balance zeta potential?
Negatively charged water?
Good old table salt?
Potassium chloride?
Tetrasodium phosphate?!
Zeta potential seems to be fairly involved to measure: electron microscope,etc.: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/72171...Is there a standard easy(ish) way for a lab to measure zeta potential that one can request?
I am not familiar with the scelerascope being used in pediatric patients, but one of my friends used an opthalmoscope to look at the eyes of many children at the ER with vaccine injuries and saw the same general patterns (this requires a lot of skill).
A few people I know are working on the sclerascope approach for COVID-19 vaccine injuries.
In the future I am going to write an article on this topic.
You can discern a lot of signs of microstrokes and poor zeta potential from a good physical examination.
You probably have seen this already
https://open.substack.com/pub/moderndiscontent/p/the-hospitalmicrobiome-paradigm?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
One of the major challenges in medicine is that you can find evidence to support any given theory.
In the case of COVID-19, it had some characteristics which were very different from other infections. The issues one would ascribe to microbial imbalances existed long before COVID-19 (e.g., almost everyone who in hospitalized gets an IV catheter) and prior to COVID-19 did not cause the unique issues with COVID-19.
The spike protein does damage and alter the gut microbiome (it's very unique as most human viruses won't do that). Additionally, there is a case to be made that pathogenic mycoplasma are playing a key role in COVID-19. However, those are beyond the scope of what this article goes into.
I'm still reading the article, but I wanted to let you know about a typo in the third paragraph:
"Finally, *once they have no longer need you*, they will discard you and leave you to pick up the pieces (which is often almost impossible if you have a life-changing medical injury)."
😊
Forgot to mention but this was corrected; thank you!
Is it possible for you to generate a transcript of a video without subtitles? I found an interesting interview (Google already modifies its search engine for this person), but it is only in German.
I just used the subtitles youtube generated and translated them.
The problem is that the interview I want to show you is from the side of an Austrian non-msm TV channel.
https://auf1.tv/berlin-mitte-auf1/berlin-mitte-auf1-wir-erleben-das-sterben-der-geimpften/
Here is a previous interview with him
https://odysee.com/@True_World:f/Graphene-Shrapnel-In-Vaccines-German-Industrial-Engineer-Whistleblower-Holger-Reissner-spot---Grafenove-Ostre-Ulomky-ve-Vakcinach-nyni-vysvetleno-i-inzenyrem-Reissnerem-Nemecko-spot:7
Link, please?
I had no idea attorneys looked at it!
Thank you doctor for this article.
They definitely have raised some interesting questions on what standard regulators actually use to determine if a medication is too deadly to have on the market!