I agree with your point about the history of science and medicine being full of bad ideas like lobotomies, but as you can see, that practice was discredited because of Dr. Peter Breggin, who was the first to expose its dangers and who is now known as “the conscience of psychiatry” for helping to abolish that barbaric practice (truthcomestolight.com/d…).
Today, Dr. Breggin is trying to expose the grave hazards associated with the COVID injections, but pharma-funded fact-chokers have smeared him and anyone else who dares to counter the narrative.
The minute you introduce an arbiter of truth, that arbiter takes on a godlike role and becomes responsible for adjudicating between truth and fact on behalf of the public. That power alone should terrify anyone, but combine that with the rampant corruption that occurs when such entities are funded by the very corporations and organizations that benefit financially from curating a particular narrative, and you wind up with the shitfuckery that has defined the past three years.
When you have complete transparency and distributed data analysis and research being conducted by as many people as possible around the world, you arrive at verifiable, evidence-based conclusions more rapidly. As long as there are not dubious entities impeding the flow of information and communication, tragic practices like lobotomies can be halted in their tracks by the likes of those captures in this penetrating Note:
