The Supreme Court's decision last month in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health ended the constitutional right to an abortion. But for millions of women, their practical access to reproductive healthcare in the future remains up in the air. Much depends on the results of the midterm elections — particularly the gubernatorial contests.
I love how the DoorDash director of public affairs tries to explain away the company's donations to the RGA with the notion they've also donated to the DGA. On the issue of abortion rights, though, there is no "both sides" argument. At a time like this, there is no excuse for these corporations to be supporting anti-choice candidates. None.
Cynical calculation: the extra income generated from lower corporate tax rates is much larger than the expenditure to help affected employees travel for abortions (if they actually help at all). So the corporations will continue to both sides it or outright support the GOP financially while playing progressive on Twitter. Thanks for showing everyone the receipts, Judd.
As usual, thank you for your intensive research and reporting, We appreciate the long and hard work of you and your team. But, as usual, it's hard to click a "heart...like" button when I feel so anguished by the content. What to do when so many people know so little, and take unwise and unknowingly heartless political sides? I also feel this way regarding our earth's ecology and enormous distress--air, water, soil. I've wished there were a way all elected political servants of we the people had to watch all of the environmental documentaries I've watched over the last 10 years. And I've wished I could impart my knowledge about the many physical health necessities for abortion. One bottom line for me is to despise the errant thinking but not the unwitting perpetrators.
I love how the DoorDash director of public affairs tries to explain away the company's donations to the RGA with the notion they've also donated to the DGA. On the issue of abortion rights, though, there is no "both sides" argument. At a time like this, there is no excuse for these corporations to be supporting anti-choice candidates. None.
Cynical calculation: the extra income generated from lower corporate tax rates is much larger than the expenditure to help affected employees travel for abortions (if they actually help at all). So the corporations will continue to both sides it or outright support the GOP financially while playing progressive on Twitter. Thanks for showing everyone the receipts, Judd.
Again, my frustration that I have zero choice but to use CVS because of my health insurance must be expressed.
Peril of living in a market oligopoly. Another policy failure.
As usual, thank you for your intensive research and reporting, We appreciate the long and hard work of you and your team. But, as usual, it's hard to click a "heart...like" button when I feel so anguished by the content. What to do when so many people know so little, and take unwise and unknowingly heartless political sides? I also feel this way regarding our earth's ecology and enormous distress--air, water, soil. I've wished there were a way all elected political servants of we the people had to watch all of the environmental documentaries I've watched over the last 10 years. And I've wished I could impart my knowledge about the many physical health necessities for abortion. One bottom line for me is to despise the errant thinking but not the unwitting perpetrators.