When I started the day, I had something else to write in mind, but alas the trend is your friend, till the end, until it bends (and punches you in the face). I usually abstain from a lot of politics and political talk certain aspects are rather incisive in general precisely because of broader trends, and longer-term objectives from different “players”.
As I wrote multiple times, despite personal beliefs and narratives pushed around, mRNA as a therapeutic platform isn’t going anywhere. It is almost a stretch of faith to think that DARPA-created tech, DoD-backed, and puppeteered pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer, and Moderna) will suddenly vanish from the planet. In case you need “evidence” for my assertion beside the ones I presented multiple times before.
34 NIH funded research grants that were directly related to mRNA covid-19 vaccines were identified. These grants combined with other identified US government grants and contracts totaled $31.9bn (£26.3bn; €29.7bn), of which $337m was invested pre-pandemic. Pre-pandemic, the NIH invested $116m (35%) in basic and translational science related to mRNA vaccine technology, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) ($148m; 44%) and the Department of Defense ($72m; 21%) invested in vaccine development
Among the longest and most successful tactics used by those in the upper echelons of society throughout time, “small victories” are one of the most effective when the goal is shifting laws or policies long-term, divide and conquer is the most successful one. A primary example in regards to the subject at hand is this one when the French authorities recommended anyone under 30 to not get vaccinated with Moderna and instead get Pfizer.
Now some necessary context. Some time ago a Legislative bill was proposed in France, one that sparked a lot of debate and well-deserved criticism, it mirrored pretty well the atrocious “WHO Treaty” in many regards and this will be very important later on in this article. You can read the entire thing here, but the specific section that caused concern was Article 4 (translated).
After Article 223-1-1 of the penal code, an article 223-1-2 is inserted with the following wording:
"Art. 223-1-2. – Whoever provokes the abandonment or abstention from following a therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment is punishable by one year of imprisonment and a fine of 15,000 euros when this abandonment or abstention is presented as beneficial to the health of the individuals concerned, while it is, based on medical knowledge, manifestly likely to cause serious consequences to their physical or mental health given the pathology they suffer from.
"Provocation to adopt practices presented as having a therapeutic or prophylactic purpose for the individuals concerned, while it is manifest, based on medical knowledge, that these practices expose them to an immediate risk of death or injuries likely to result in mutilation or permanent disability, is punishable by the same penalties.
"When the provocation provided for in the first two paragraphs has resulted in effects, the penalties are increased to three years of imprisonment and a fine of 45,000 euros.
"When these offenses are committed through written or audiovisual media, the specific provisions of the laws governing these matters apply regarding the determination of responsible persons."
This quickly earned this document the “Pfizer bill/amendment”. Merely a couple of days ago this law was passed, it still can be rebuked but the important aspect it how it was silently introduced again. One of my biggest concerns is the broad characterization of the “criticism” aspect, especially with the addendum of “current medical knowledge.
What is labeled criticism here can broadly be labeled as the inquiry into the safety of the mRNA platform, making it illegal is borderline insane. Criticism and inquiry into the mRNA vaccines is what enabled the shift of narrative and honest scientific inquiry after 2 years, without a major fear of having your entire academic career taken away from you.
Don’t let the atrociousness of the law fool you, similar laws will be proposed elsewhere, worse laws have already been proposed, passed, and approved, such as the Brazilian law obligating mothers under government assistance to vaccinate their children or otherwise they don’t get the money. This is the reason you should not allow small victories to cloud your judgment and muddy long-term goals and the bird’s eye view.
Governments will be able to use the harder economic situations they and their moronic think tanks and Intelligence services caused around the world to force the people in most need to accept these laws that strip them of their natural rights, and as a nice byproduct, nudge them into forcing others to accept it too.
The laws themselves are not exactly my main point here, but the specification on naming the mRNA platform is precise because of the vested interest of the WHO and its treaty.
While the US government, and especially DoD/DARPA have vested and deep interests in the adoption of mRNA as a global therapeutic platform, the WHO also spearheads the push for widespread adoption, even in poor countries that can foot the bill. After all, producing mRNA when you have the infrastructure and logistics is “cheap”, but setting up the entire pipeline and dealing with the Intellectual Property and secrecy in the formulas involved is quite expensive.
This is why one of the core interests of the WHO and bilaterally its Treaty is the mRNA tech transfer hub. Its first “hub” is in Cape Town. Opposition at a local (national) level is necessary, but supra-sovereign backdoor deals such as the WHO Treaty are a real threat. Trans-national accords by which governments can coordinate and bypass all their laws, checks, and balances at the same time.
If there is one thing I learned so far in the last decade is that you can’t save everyone, and some people don’t want to be saved because of their beliefs, but I am vehemently against forcing anyone to do anything against their will. A new pandemic will occur, and the last one taught everyone, including politicians that half of the population can be manipulated into ripping apart any constitution in the name of “safety”.
Opposing these draconic, tyrannic laws is necessary, but at least a few need to keep a level head and think about the big picture, be practical, keeping critical thinking. The best strategic approach is freedom of choice and thought. I would be doing a disservice to everyone who reads me if I were here to merely placate your feelings and write whatever reinforces your beliefs.
All the other potential ways to fight this aren’t to be discussed openly, there is no point to, so for the average Joe, the normal person with a lot on their plate already, pressuring for freedom of choice is enough. Free access to information, especially scientific information, and freedom to independently research and publish the research are necessary too (make no mistake, they will try to make this illegal too).
And to my amusement, as I wrote multiple times, almost all elites got vaccinated. COVID-vaccinated royalty who suddenly developed cancer was in the news recently (I am fully and completely aware this is more complex but LET ME INDULGE). They all got it. The Spike Protein was the biggest AI bait in scientific history. Not funny for people who suffer or suffered from any adverse effects of the vaccines, you have my support.
Hilarious to me when the so-called elite get the short end of the stick.
If you choose to support my work, thank you ! Otherwise, I hope most of my posts are useful to you.
I am honest and sincere to my own detriment. So I rather write what I really think, rather than lie to you.
It may read little bit as a black pill, but it isn't.
Agree with your suggested path forward. Put up as big a tent as possible - and freedom of information with regard to all media is the biggest tent possible to let the truth emerge through open debate including extreme viewpoints. The topics of importance to various groups and individuals differ, but the distrust in both the government , the elites and the MSM is widespread .For some it has developed due to the widespread vaccine and Covid misinformation. For some it was the Russian collusion hoax. For some it has emerged from the trans propaganda. But in all cases people want to choose which information sources they come to trust. Everyone knows that such statements as “ just trust the science “ or “climate change is settled science” are inimical to the scientific method, and simply the elites attempting to tell the unwashed masses to trust their supposed more intelligent betters who don’t have to shop at Walmart .