White Rural Voters, Supreme Court, Humor and Elections Threaten Our Democracy!
Bizarro World
Our democracy has never been so threatened!
For example, Keith Olbermann complains that the US Supreme Court has betrayed democracy with its unanimous decision of today. Keith calls for the Supreme Court to be dissolved - out of his protectiveness for our democracy, of course. Our democratic system does not need no stinking Supreme Court!
White Rural Voters Threaten Democratic Values!
White rural voters are a huge danger, as well. A new book explains:
Large news stations such as MSNBC devote a lot of attention to it:
NY Times’ economic expert Paul Krugman agrees:
Humor a Huge Threat to Democratic Values
Political science researchers, claiming a lack of conflict of interest, researched a mysterious phenomenon called humor and concluded that it also threatens our democracy. I covered this story last November:
Eliminate Elections to Save Democracy!
The most serious threat to an advanced democracy, of course, is voting and elections.
The New York Times published an article by WEF adviser Adam Grant, who also advises the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Prof. Grant makes a case that elections are bad for democracy:
So bad are elections for Democracy that House Democrats are prepared to cancel their result if they go the wrong way:
Not respecting results of a vote used to be called insurrection. But that is a completely wrong approach in 2024 when such a thing should be called “defending our democracy,” you see.
My sense of what kind of planet I am living on is summed up in this image (hat tip @gorskon):
Sadly, American politics has deteriorated, and such stupidity is not limited to just one political party. But this is a topic for another post…
What is the biggest threat to our democracy nowadays? Please express your opinion!
I know a bunch of these people. 1) They’re too busy working and raising their families to rage. 2) They know the difference between a man and a woman. 3) They think DEI, CRT and Climate Change are complete and utter BS. 4) They don’t judge by skin color. They do judge by character.
The authors of "White Rural Rage" are just mad because a block of white Americans have the gumption not to fold up into blobs of jelly in the face of the pervasive anti-white rhetoric flowing today. They won't accept that they belong to a Victimizer class or that the problems faced by blacks are anybody's fault but blacks themselves. They might even - GASP! - think that women don't need to be equally represented in math and rocket science. Or, heresy of heresies, they might think that men shouldn't compete in women's athletic events or wave their schlongs around in women's locker rooms.
The authors are projecting: the real rage comes from them.