skip to main content
10.1145/3400806.3400828acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Mapping the Narrative Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theories in Online Anti-vaccination Discussions

Published:22 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent research on conspiracy theories labels conspiracism as a distinct and deficient epistemic process. However, the tendency to pathologize conspiracism obscures the fact that it is a diverse and dynamic collective sensemaking process, transacted in public on the web. Here, we adopt a narrative framework to introduce a new analytical approach for examining online conspiracism. Narrative plays an important role because it is central to human cognition as well as being domain agnostic, and so can serve as a bridge between conspiracism and other modes of knowledge production. To illustrate the utility of our approach, we use it to analyze conspiracy theories identified in conversations across three different anti-vaccination discussion forums. Our approach enables us to capture more abstract categories without hiding the underlying diversity of the raw data. We find that there are dominant narrative themes across sites, but that there is also a tremendous amount of diversity within these themes. Our initial observations raise the possibility that different communities play different roles in the collective construction of conspiracy theories online. This offers one potential route for understanding not only cross-sectional differentiation, but the longitudinal dynamics of the narrative in future work. In particular, we are interested to examine how activity within the framework of the narrative shifts in response to news events and social media platforms’ nascent efforts to control different types of misinformation. Such analysis will help us to better understand how collectively constructed conspiracy narratives adapt in a shifting media ecosystem.

References

  1. Michael Barkun. 2013. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael Barkun. 2016. Conspiracy Theories as Stigmatized Knowledge. Diogenes (October 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192116669288Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jamie Bartlett and Carl Miller. 2010. The Power of Unreason. Demos, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David A. Broniatowski, Amelia M. Jamison, SiHua Qi, Lulwah AlKulaib, Tao Chen, Adrian Benton, Sandra C. Quinn, and Mark Dredze. 2018. Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate. Am J Public Health 108, 10 (August 2018), 1378–1384. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Robert Brotherton, Christopher C. French, and Alan D. Pickering. 2013. Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology 4, (2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jerome Bruner. 1991. The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry 18, 1 (1991), 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/448619Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jerome S Bruner. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press.Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Richard M. Carpiano and Nicholas S. Fitz. 2017. Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies. Social Science & Medicine 185, (July 2017), 127–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David Coady. 2012. What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michela Del Vicario, Gianna Vivaldo, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook. Scientific Reports 6, 1 (December 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37825Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry, and Annelie J. Harvey. 2016. Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning 22, 1 (January 2016), 57–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mark Fenster. 2008. Conspiracy theories: secrecy and power in American culture (Rev. and updated ed ed.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Walter R Fisher. 1989. Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. University of South Carolina Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Erving Goffman. 2009. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurtis Hagen. 2018. Conspiracy Theorists and Monological Belief Systems. In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaron Harambam and Stef Aupers. 2015. Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science. Public Understanding of Science 24, 4 (May 2015), 466–480. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514559891Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Richard Hofstadter. 2012. The paranoid style in American politics. Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Joshua Introne, Irem Gokce Yildirim, Luca Iandoli, Julia DeCook, and Shaima Elzeini. 2018. How People Weave Online Information Into Pseudoknowledge. Social Media + Society 4, 3 (July 2018), 205630511878563. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshua Introne, Luca Iandoli, Julia DeCook, Irem Gokce Yildirim, and Shaima Elzeini. 2017. The Collaborative Construction and Evolution of Pseudo-knowledge in Online Conversations. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society - #SMSociety17, ACM Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daniel Jolley and Karen M. Douglas. 2014. The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology 105, 1 (February 2014), 35–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Anna Kata. 2010. A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 28, 7 (February 2010), 1709–1716. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Anna Kata. 2012. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 30, 25 (May 2012), 3778–3789. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Péter Krekó. 2015. Conspiracy theory as collective motivated cognition. In The psychology of conspiracy.Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York,  NY,  US, 62–75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Anthony Lantian, Dominique Muller, Cécile Nurra, Olivier Klein, Sophie Berjot, and Myrto Pantazi. 2018. Stigmatized beliefs: Conspiracy theories, anticipated negative evaluation of the self, and fear of social exclusion. European Journal of Social Psychology 48, 7 (2018), 939–954. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Stephan Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer, and Gilles E. Gignac. 2013. NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. Psychological Science 24, 5 (May 2013), 622–633. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Bruce G. Link and Jo C. Phelan. 2001. Conceptualizing Stigma. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 1 (August 2001), 363–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Stephen M. E. Marmura. 2014. Likely and Unlikely Stories: Conspiracy Theories in an Age of Propaganda. International Journal of Communication 8, 0 (September 2014), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Paul Mihailidis and Samantha Viotty. 2017. Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in “Post-Fact” Society. American Behavioral Scientist 61, 4 (April 2017), 441–454. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217701217Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler, and Sean Richey. 2012. The Role of Social Networks in Influenza Vaccine Attitudes and Intentions Among College Students in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Adolescent Health 51, 3 (September 2012), 302–304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.02.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. J. Eric Oliver and Thomas J. Wood. 2014. Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science 58, 4 (2014), 952–966. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Karl Popper. 2012. The Open Society and its Enemies. Routledge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820377Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Nils B. Jostmann. 2013. Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality: Belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology 43, 1 (February 2013), 109–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mattia Samory and Tanushree Mitra. 2018. “The Government Spies Using Our Webcams”: The Language of Conspiracy Theories in Online Discussions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (November 2018), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274421Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Roger C. Schank and Robert P. Abelson. 1995. Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Knowledge and memory:  The real story.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale,  NJ,  US, 1–85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. James P. Spradley. 2016. The Ethnographic Interview. Waveland Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. NL Stein and CG Glenn. 1979. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary children, vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Cass R. Sunstein. 2014. Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures*. Journal of Political Philosophy 17, 2 (June 2009), 202–227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Viren Swami, David Barron, Laura Weis, Martin Voracek, Stefan Stieger, and Adrian Furnham. 2017. An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PLOS ONE 12, 2 (February 2017), e0172617. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172617Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Viren Swami, Martin Voracek, Stefan Stieger, Ulrich S. Tran, and Adrian Furnham. 2014. Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition 133, 3 (December 2014), 572–585. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Katharina Thalmann. 2019. The Stigmatization of Conspiracy Theory since the 1950s: “A Plot to Make us Look Foolish.”Routledge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020353Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. J. A. Whitson and A. D. Galinsky. 2008. Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception. Science 322, 5898 (October 2008), 115–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Natural News. Retrieved from https://naturalnews.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mothering. Retrieved from https://mothering.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. AboveTopSecret. Retrieved from https://abovetopsecret.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. SimpleMind. ModelMaker Tools BV - SimpleApps. Retrieved from https://simplemind.eu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SMSociety'20: International Conference on Social Media and Society
    July 2020
    317 pages
    ISBN:9781450376884
    DOI:10.1145/3400806

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format