Asia | Banyan

What is the point of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework?

America’s new Asian talking shop has its uses, even if it does not result in a trade deal

Talk to officials in Asian capitals and a theme emerges. America, they say, is happy to engage with their countries on matters of security and geopolitics, but seems uninterested in talking about trade. Such complaints are especially common in East and South-East Asia, where governments worry that China will use its economic power in the region to undermine their sovereignty. They are keen for America to deepen economic ties as a way of reducing their reliance on China. But ever since Donald Trump, the previous president, pulled America out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a big trade agreement signed by his predecessor, it has been clear that America will do no such thing.

So the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (ipef), unveiled by President Joe Biden in Tokyo on May 23rd, ought to have been warmly welcomed. In addition to America, a dozen countries, including economic heavyweights like Australia, India and Japan, were signatories at the launch (Fiji joined a few days later). These countries, Mr Biden said, “are signing up to work toward an economic vision that will deliver for all peoples”.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "A little more conversation"

AI’s new frontier

From the June 11th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Asia

Japan and South Korea are struggling with old-age poverty

Their problems may be instructive for other countries

The Philippines bans some genetically modified foods

But golden rice could help thousands of nutrient-deficient children


Meet the maharajas of the world’s biggest democracy

Indian officialdom still treats citizens like subjects