The app for independent voices

This is a variation of a phenomenon that designers have observed. We approach “low-fi” prototypes— unfinished-looking sketches, manuscripts printed in draft mode, demo tapes— differently than we do things that look really clean and finished. We’re more likely to focus on the underlying concepts, to offer more substantive and useful criticism with lo-fi prototypes, than we do when presented with something that looks super-polished. I talk about it in a recent article: askpang.substack.com/p/…

I’ve discussed this in a few of my posts re UX design and conversation.

We have dressed up our machines to look and feel like a person, and the anthropomorphisation of it continues by regarding its outputs above our own.

Thanks for highlighting this Stef Hutka, PhD

This tendency to trust automated outputs over your own judgment is something human factors …

Feb 25
at
2:02 AM
Relevant people

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.