The app for independent voices

Mona Lazar's avatar

This man is one of a kind!

SmallBites's avatar

Jasmine Crockett to Pam Bondi:

So much respect for Jasmine Crockett.

Aaron Parnas's avatar

The media is scared of Donald Trump because if he attacks them, they lose money.

I'm not scared.

I'm not backed by big corporate sponsors. I will always stand up to Trump.

You made it, you own it

You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.

Adam Kinzinger's avatar

I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period

Great discussions

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.

Matt Laslo's avatar
Ask a Pol uaps
Ask a Pol uaps
Rep. Andre Carson on UAP / drone investigations: "our adversaries are watching and listening"
0:00
-2:53
Joseph Felser's avatar

Carson referred to the SCIF (on “drones”?) and the “open hearings.” Was that a reference to the UAP hearings? So is he tacitly amalgamating “drones” with UAP? That would be big.

Matt Laslo's avatar

Hesitate answering this, but yeah -- the terms are used interchangeably on Capitol Hill.

As in: When I say 'drones' I'm saying 'uaps' 50-70% of the time, cause most lawmakers won't discuss 'uaps' even as they have all the thoughts on the unknown objects they refer to as 'drones'...

Yes, but whereas most of them are content to hide behind the fig leaf of “drones,” Carson seemed to be acknowledging the game with his comment. I suspect he knows a great deal more about the subject than many.

Jan 15
at
1:52 AM