One thing I'd strongly encourage digging into deeper, everyone, is that around 2001, the U.S. Federal Government figured out how to lean in on the implication of the internet, resulting in monopolies that transformed the open internet that some of us remember, into what it is now (a few dominant websites and experiences). They went after Microsoft, and the result wasn't the breakup of AT&T kind of thing that had previously occurred; instead, it was a boom of regulation under false pretenses of privacy, security, and protecting the users: https://paulobrien.substack.com/p/the-ip-trap-how-licensing-knowledge Since then, Facebook sat before Congress and made legislators look like morons, we've had to incessantly debate net neutrality (as though internet access should have ANY restrictions at all), Google and Apple wrestled for control, and now we have the AI era.
We all live under an *illusion* of a competitive free market online.
In a world that used to be determined by Marketing (the practice of studying the market to provide value, resulting in companies incessantly trying to be better), arguably, became a world in which every innovation (every startup) needs an Executive in Public Policy, Government Relations, and capital to lobby.
This is a great analysis Farida. What I want to encourage is that much of all of this is determined by how Congress will determine winners and losers. That's not a good thing, just the way it is.